Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for a JS API for NoPlan (adding multiple sources without encoding them in SDP)

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA8621F9CF5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irzIUNDV5qx1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18EF21F9D09 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=360; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1372458539; x=1373668139; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=NiZ41cdd1uw3ZSr7xrHF8wckhDwoTQymvb0TppKaiDw=; b=hP6nJqja0yMLS748Dun0rdJK/kGqfoH8YRHmulkTmP4G1Slhrx5/DQ37 zW7AGXSGIQVpnr/cGK+brDryYsL9Veq+zXEctgM8h4Lt8BqnaOX6AfYXT 90GxUMZmiqh8J142VVIV1MkSqoARrvxBgXEgTcMPAYphvRJ5EFTth5xuS Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAKsMzlGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABbgwl7vwqBChZ0giMBAQEDATo/BQsCAQgiFAULIRElAgQOBQiHdQMJBQGxcg2IUoxugjUCMQeDBGMDlV6OB4UlgViBOYIo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,962,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="228793536"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2013 22:28:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5SMSwft009956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:28:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.116]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:28:55 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Proposal for a JS API for NoPlan (adding multiple sources without encoding them in SDP)
Thread-Index: AQHOdE7g5/y6jULE6kGJ5GQef/y6YQ==
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:28:57 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135B686C@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CAJrXDUHdoxLTsofiwLBdwBNnCCkCBgjSdbmLaXrNEPODMrsSVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2m4VwkpbdGE+q73qqij5RDCB4Vb-Ui1LmGSx1zmv8TX2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2m4VwkpbdGE+q73qqij5RDCB4Vb-Ui1LmGSx1zmv8TX2g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.20.14]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <DBBFEFB6A70FFA468C48633F07902701@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for a JS API for NoPlan (adding multiple sources without encoding them in SDP)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:29:14 -0000

On Jun 17, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Having hit my
> head hard against the limitations of the current WebRTC API and being
> forced to learn SDP to achieve some of the less common use cases, I'm
> feeling the pain.

Could you let us know the use cases of what it is you need an easy way to do ?