Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012
<Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> Tue, 02 October 2012 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E917D21F857E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PS8Cmbz1qqAk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCA021F8543 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh104.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.30]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q92IUQH0029156; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:30:27 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:30:26 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.5]) by 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 20:30:25 +0200
From: Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
To: ted.ietf@gmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012
Thread-Index: AQHNoLtUIKedTdT5iU+iT3jOpQ5mSpemVBjg
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:30:25 +0000
Message-ID: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7622D2216@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDwPjg8OW_Km1oaue=b-=U1FPouKL82s7POR1zNRiWhfA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA504vqo9m1WO=cm8rpXqSEA8v8aFF0n+C_XL+8X0dxow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA504vqo9m1WO=cm8rpXqSEA8v8aFF0n+C_XL+8X0dxow@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.163.174.233]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2012 18:30:26.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE1385F0:01CDA0CB]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:30:31 -0000
Hi, Why do you want to receive these proposals as drafts instead of just on the mailing list? I have a proposal/opinion and a few simple arguments for it, but writing a draft about it seems like a lot of overhead. Markus >-----Original Message----- >From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf >Of ext Ted Hardie >Sent: 02 October, 2012 19:25 >To: rtcweb@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012 > >Just a reminder that this deadline is approaching quickly; please get your >drafts in! > >thanks, > >Ted Hardie > > >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >> As agreed at the recent meeting, the chairs solicit internet-drafts >> naming proposed mandatory-to-implement video codecs or codec sets by >> October 15th, 2012. Please include any technical data you believe >> supports the choice you are proposing. A non-exhaustive list of data >> you may wish to include is found in slides 3-6 of >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-rtcweb-4.pptx . >> >> Discussion based on these will commence immediately upon receipt, >> rather than waiting until the October 15th deadline, so early >> submission is encouraged. >> >> regards, >> >> Ted Hardie >_______________________________________________ >rtcweb mailing list >rtcweb@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, … Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15… Ted Hardie