Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and requirement document, "Emergency Services"
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 30 April 2013 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1019F21F9B7C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.524, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUK85OJCfxfx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s27.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s27.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2069821F9B2F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W11 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s27.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:47:05 -0700
X-EIP: [mjOD/o4lWJ5+2PgWSgRFq8awddw14pTy]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W11DC36B4D15CBCD00E509493B30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_741fb516-2033-4363-8f9c-8750a6dd3cee_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:47:05 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <008601ce45bc$96b49bb0$c41dd310$@shockey.us>
References: <517E7D25.2030706@ericsson.com> <517F95C3.90101@omnitor.se>, <008601ce45bc$96b49bb0$c41dd310$@shockey.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2013 17:47:05.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAB2E680:01CE45CA]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and requirement document, "Emergency Services"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:47:11 -0000
The below reference is significant for WebRTC because it indicates that browsers are regulated under Section 716 of CVAA with respect to "Advanced Communications Services". Are there also provisions of the Report & Order relevant to emergency services?Richard pointed to: http://www.fcc.gov/document/section-718-accessibility-requirements-internet-browsers-mobile-0
- [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and re… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Bernard Aboba