IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Fri, 04 November 2011 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D298611E80C6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9siSEqqowBeJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A861A11E80B9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pool-173-49-135-74.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([173.49.135.74] helo=[192.168.1.12]) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1RMQ5U-00044H-JC for rtcweb@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:10:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4EB44684.30801@jesup.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:09:40 -0400
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <E37C139C5CB78244A781E9E7B721527B5485F6@USSCMB03.plt.plantronics.com> <CAErhfrwEZ86DCQOREhUQ2eMP99LKf2ausAvWbKYX5oj=_6YDyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrwNwd3NZmWb7L3+F72dBKi=mrhYJoMXkVREbXRXS8E-HA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkVir+qYbviNZdNMJ3ECCaGACPBLdN+dxH3f6Pk7W3s+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrwfgDQDiOiPh3R7fGSr-Qy97f2DmPF_vLAp-GqnF1qBdQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErhfrwfgDQDiOiPh3R7fGSr-Qy97f2DmPF_vLAp-GqnF1qBdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:10:40 -0000

On 11/4/2011 1:26 PM, Xavier Marjou wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>> wrote:
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-rtcweb-sip-interworking-requirements-00, which
>     I fully support by the way.
>
>     Xavier, such draft does not propose that Webrtc must implement all
>     the requirements in the draft. It just lists all the requirements
>     needed in order to fully interoperate with current SIP deployments
>     and opens the door for discussion about it.
>
> You rephrasing is correct : however the draft does indicate that many
> codecs would be desirable from an interworking perspective

For example, G.722 would be desirable for some interoperation scenarios, 
even though it's worse than Opus at similar bitrates. (And it's no 
longer under patent)

>     So let me know: do you support that browsers must implement g729?
>
> yes (for some calls, not for all calls)

Just to note: G.729's license requirements make supporting it a virtual 
impossibility for Mozilla, and unlikely for the other browsers.


-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email