Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation
Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org> Wed, 23 October 2013 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ABE11E80DC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JoCzjoAdvoWE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.zaytoon.hidayahonline.net (zaytoon.hidayahonline.net [173.193.202.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F2F11E82C4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (d60-65-38-134.col.wideopenwest.com [65.60.134.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: basilgohar@librevideo.org) by mail.zaytoon.hidayahonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBDEE659EA2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <52671AF7.5040107@librevideo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:40:23 -0400
From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
Organization: Libre Video
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <52665274.9080705@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <52665274.9080705@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:40:43 -0000
On 10/22/2013 06:24 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > In my VP8 advocate draft, I referred to a subjective evaluation test > (test with > actual human viewers) done between VP8 and H.264 Baseline by a neutral > (non-Google) laboratory. > > The attached presentation is the writeup of the results of that test. > Are the sources used in the video comparison test available anywhere? -- Libre Video http://librevideo.org
- [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation Harald Alvestrand