Re: [rtcweb] Solutions sought for non-ICE RTC calls, not +1 (Re: Requiring ICE for RTC calls)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 28 September 2011 08:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C4421F8CC4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgy-XSjVJPDZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E982721F8B06 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so6257035vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.23.4 with SMTP id i4mr8303865vdf.514.1317198974432; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.118.143 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E8265D3.5020809@skype.net>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl> <CAD5OKxt=P3jg9N0weFUZLvUYQxyeXa+9YMtpc8wn7osuPQmTpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtVCgiFV_iAYd1w0uZZcS5+gsixOHJ0jGN=0CMdq++kdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3PrnNyesL+x-mto9Q9djjiJ13QZHXCiGfY1mv3nubrqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsKTHCuBQdUnGQtGfF7NmZZExLe9Q9B9cNR=483neuHPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1rzdmviAnGknVZmrU_TDNoC3NmWd1g6iyx0WzZ4xB3Pw@mail.gmail.com> <4E820825.9090101@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvmKi3Py0gNcTdREdfS07hA-=f6L+u8KKVgSWztMft9kQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmL4VSRE+kgs5kXzQc3mCHnKpU-EAbVPKO4QNEYLKje=A@mail.gmail.com> <4E821E47.4080205@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfndBhod6Hoq6h63795x8f=ew28rDys=Fx8ScwVpVJwp1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOoF6MNSpATG2+_e99iRq7Jf9OoWWNCa=qRGW_v+maoHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxubnxLAqybCgnBXpKR9S0rBEsoDg9enCaverjVWYad7Ew@mail.gmail.com> <4E8265D3.5020809@skype.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:36:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnC9qB+gjMAqg_511oPcEbm4B=uSO_ZQOrZ+F+DVtwZ2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Solutions sought for non-ICE RTC calls, not +1 (Re: Requiring ICE for RTC calls)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:33:29 -0000

2011/9/28 Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>et>:
> ICE needs to be a MUST. Debate is still going on support (or not) for plain
> RTP.

After all these threads, now I strongly consider that ICE should be a MUST.

But I don't think the same for SRTP. I don't consider that content
carried via plain RTP is more important than content carried via HTTP,
and AFAIK HTTPS is not a requirement in RFC 2616, neither in any web
browser.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>