Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876081AE23F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mmDjNOcYt2c for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22f.google.com (mail-ve0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A44C1AE247 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id jx11so125881veb.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LJj/lynV2tnHjhXyZ8S54pRXAy88xjhNV47tv/DryrI=; b=JCtBA2l3mKAUI4FslGRPAXONMrMjqx2PkFAzQg+SbBGiVLoYYbsXAdOsF/Ca7dVKox VQV+HLl1ClKUv3Oqn2pB6leQVM41koUSQvf3qUTW9G8tsGxG2yCav8FH+ypY6EFyX8Kr e5/J8SzqtpsgSgNNrtkScFRnpGQKBRLhCTsalxn2witpIuN/OT62RrQhLgExexWiMUWS 9IUAbEorUDkwOsgQkcYtoiiUnhw1Z4ypNf9wOp8HSk9nRhFzTtHBT/uGV4u1HIEbgmPF my19X2t7GxpyhH5O8slDnKB/zmfY7q2XUND7otU/7JEiAxtNg8W/N/KcI9spNl+b8TUc v0bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=LJj/lynV2tnHjhXyZ8S54pRXAy88xjhNV47tv/DryrI=; b=DXTfbe1x6nVWL1v5/YoeD1UXK7GvMkNENEtJ2sIhVAAaTTe7FdPNlMldiTC+KyucGu tv2u6olP/r5fAIBRsxtt6jlFmK6alnNV5OjjWecNW85UnqZ2CakVvuvtar2MfbVCrATA sp73U4hqlOUnagvNrBfv5vtI+1iaMfF+gSy8Z5bwKRBHSOYASiURGpr4SYhQI00vxGUk E/UxxZthX23F9vm1XqRyOSHJ+ctIVAiJFPR70ZNUVnmP+PBjqnetSMwKLKlKquZPib2t rLPSa5VX69S6WrGJrKKf7n+NF7DeugRAnReB9Wc/wpBCpJfmH03c90/3O2zq060qQy4x Z3QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlttjMvwoq9GxcDODtZHTKkaz9/TVxaxzHVfVI10XEV9bbwpJl5K8jd3r/IOizW8WmBjAlxRkc3Zr12Wht+QOp4cPWiCQPWRpjuiy4M4XOAN5ZSHiOc8AUILEBGJt8Qu44BNGzCy6fR0aFAeDpytEnudfAQYRp+8s2BAz/kXnEjXr+T3wf7I6p/GJaKX5lv9ESZlX9Y
X-Received: by 10.52.98.99 with SMTP id eh3mr3386080vdb.29.1385060205351; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.110.101 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8647A71C-CDCF-4897-96D6-4CD1C6566BE6@cisco.com>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com> <8647A71C-CDCF-4897-96D6-4CD1C6566BE6@cisco.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:56:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1kdXreZbF0Q7=DinObV5=eWcdfFuwrJ13BQ0Hk=Fec-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)" <jlaurens@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f38888869cf04ebb475fb
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:56:54 -0000

Following an IETF meeting on Jabber doesn't count as participating?

The "big guy vs little guy" narrative continues...


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens) <
jlaurens@cisco.com>; wrote:

> If they participated in the mailing list they would be included. I can't
> imagine that simply logging into a chat room in order to vote qualifies you.
>
>
> On Nov 21, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>;
> wrote:
>
>
> On 21 November 2013 08:51, Magnus Westerlund <
> magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>; wrote:
>
> 2) Establish those eligible to vote.  Any participant in the
>> working group process either electronically or in-person as of yesterday
>> (20th of November). Who has participated in the Working group process
>> will be anyone that can be identified from:
>>  - The Blue Sheets for any RTCWEB WG session during an IETF meeting or
>>    an interim meeting since the WG's creation.
>>  - posting of at least one email to the RTCWEB mailing list
>>
>> The voter must at time of voting prove their eligibility, by pointing to
>> the mail archive or a particular blue sheet/meeting. Please verify your
>> own eligibility.
>>
>>
>>
> What about those who are not on the blue sheets because we participated
> (and at the last meeting voted/hummed on this issue) through Jabber?
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>  _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>