IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan

Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Sat, 21 September 2013 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFF111E817C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pw0l+1NV2mBb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D834D11E817A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id jy17so1091846qeb.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=e9CSIAVLUeEMCdgmsXOoRvKc+79TTP52WesSEYDfKOg=; b=jv4NKCxbPcObFZ9h/uprDBIQdNXmHlXNFLepq+7tYOm3GcaV9p1+77uoR7cW8CzwT3 sGunPR6+s4Z0ipd4M7ExkWcHB4lc4QacJfe6DJIvp3ldxqakHaniNlvx3NW0o/wA8vZW K2FrlLZYK0gYUjrFfMRh5Xqx74RAc5eJJMSsGZLh6PfXlHZo4F2LICvwaEUOh/izjLvG jKRTIpKxujsFeqQKvLMw9K+owbNtLseDWkR2UNJd91DyxhWe6smDDzzpGjAgtn35gpiN ueVNk9uc/O12SHGvSleMuZutWstiupAreZCcSCmP/D6G0a0habWaMXdTOP5cJ6VDMUD6 5IIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWfP2QTeMVwCM58i1cogAf3hs0xeRvrQQaU54QiFip8hAfTtKp3z9IPDVPxboBLR+9u6NL
X-Received: by 10.49.15.97 with SMTP id w1mr18311869qec.13.1379785387097; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.42.14] (out-pq-242.wireless.telus.com. [216.218.29.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h2sm28081812qev.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <523DDA90.6080600@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:42:40 -0400
From: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com> <5238A564.2070601@bbs.darktech.org> <CA+9kkMC9pTRvNsSeO5CzxsiL7k3ab3MDcceyECawXrpz33tGQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMC9pTRvNsSeO5CzxsiL7k3ab3MDcceyECawXrpz33tGQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000101090908020904000101"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:43:21 -0000

On 9/17/2013 4:10 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:54 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org 
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Ted,
>
>         Seeing as this discussion stems from licensing concerns, I
>     like to propose the following alternative:
>
>      1. Mandate a video codec whose IPR has expired. I agree that
>         video quality will degrade, which brings me to the next point.
>
>
> To propose a video codec, please write a draft before the deadline and 
> put forward the technical details you're proposing (if there are 
> profiles, for example, which profile).  Saying you want this on the 
> list isn't enough information for folks to judge the proposal.  This 
> is why we are insisting on drafts at a deadline that gives folks the 
> opportunity to review the proposal.

Ted,

     I understand, but unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth to 
author such a draft so I'm out. However, I will support anyone who 
decides go ahead (with H261, Theora, etc).

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email