Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Proposal

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Wed, 21 September 2011 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E72F5E800C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GC6BOJ0IQR7c for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D085E800A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [165.123.243.248] (helo=[10.10.8.117]) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1R6Orw-0005Ng-8p for rtcweb@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:37:52 -0500
Message-ID: <4E7A04D1.3060903@jesup.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:37:53 -0700
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <4E777500.5030201@alvestrand.no> <69262135-CF5D-4E79-85CD-82DFDC4250C0@acmepacket.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233F6F222@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E788458.1090108@alvestrand.no> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233F6F2A0@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E788E5C.9090306@alvestrand.no> <11209B22-4D96-4367-BC31-A4D586B55A83@edvina.net> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233F6F2EB@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <1A61D589-1C23-4364-AA4A-60338D8C5859@edvina.net> <4E798D47.5030905@jesup.org> <CAD5OKxsVc6OM8o5dbkRZoQPZs6bNEiumdRYFCf7+pjG_cpS0Mw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsVc6OM8o5dbkRZoQPZs6bNEiumdRYFCf7+pjG_cpS0Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:35:24 -0000

On 9/21/2011 8:00 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> Randell,
>
> Are we going to create multiple PeerConnections in case of forking 
> when multiple ANSWER + ACCEPT are received?

That would be up to the application in my proposal.  I stated that on 
ACCEPT the OFFERer MAY close any 'warm' PeerConnections:

5) when the OFFERer receives an ACCEPT, it MAY close other PeerConnections
   opened speculatively.

I didn't specify, but there's no requirement on multiple ACCEPT to close 
the other connections, so it's up to the app.

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org