Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

Christer Holmberg <> Fri, 05 December 2014 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578761ACAD8 for <>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:09:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id np7iR2BKPoyo for <>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27401ACDA2 for <>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:09:14 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79fc6d000001087-4a-548168282e08
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EF.16.04231.82861845; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:09:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:09:12 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
Thread-Index: AQHQD/is2LdRMrUKckucyL6VrCW5HJyApObQ
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:09:12 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5mRmOIwZN0i47JbBZr/7WzOzB5 TPm9kdVjyZKfTAFMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZnyd/Zi24wFNx6OkhtgbGdq4uRk4OCQETifUd O5ghbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICRxhlJjatZkRJCEksJhR4sCK8i5GDg42AQuJ7n/aIGERgQiJidcv sIHYwgLeEvv33GCEiPtI/Ds+nxXCNpJ4tvYwC0gri4CKxO5tQSBhXgFfiVsTFrNCTLeRePt+ GROIzSlgK3Gy6yPYGEagc76fWgMWZxYQl7j1ZD4TxJkCEkv2nIc6WVTi5eN/rBC2osTHV/sY Iep1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4mhlir6DEyZlPWCYwis5CMnYWkpZZSFpmIWlZwMiyilG0OLW4ODfd yFgvtSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMwPg5u+a27g3H1a8dDjAIcjEo8vBvkG0OEWBPLiitzDzFKc7Ao ifMuOjcvWEggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOj9Uy3LV6qKx1Wz23QvH2uIXDmm4SH /+qe1MmWHSjcnJBpVbo5adfKkHbLfUcVpWL5Ejg4PDf/WbVJL7V+ftme5OI7jkuyGm8tPH/r jdPFVDWvTts/J8v+MkSE5Mhe6X8m4ie4uGXN+dsR3ufebq7+2LdCfafa57lXhFWnyASv/x/m VDarryxJiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA3i3JU3ACAAA=
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:09:31 -0000


A strong support for: 

	A) yes, draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways should be adopted as a WG document now.

I get questions regarding the differences (in terms of supported features) between WebRTC browsers and gateway on a daily basis, so I believe the industry really needs a document clarifying those things.



-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb [] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Sent: 4. joulukuuta 2014 21:30
Subject: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

Having reviewed the fine technical comments on this draft since we asked for comments, the chairs have noted that multiple people seem to have read the draft. Given this great news we are going make a call for adoption. 

If you have an opinion, please email the list by Dec 19 and let us know if you either:

A) yes, draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways should be adopted as a WG document now

B) no, not right now 

If we get consensus around A we will work with ADs on milestone. Otherwise we will encourage the authors to keep working on this draft and continue using this email list. We may adopt it later or include the text in other drafts. 

The Chairs (Cullen, Sean, Ted)

PS - if you want to send an email that says more than A or B, feel free to change the subject, start a new thread etc. 

rtcweb mailing list