IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates

youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <youennf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10613131217 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d86JmQwo_vmn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C28131127 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id p6-v6so20405175ljc.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vLk4kS7W6SY0Jdl+M12Z16iagUNOOJTDpgXeFNMmUGg=; b=ANJzc90zKk0Nvu5bt69in7TSzvDqRiFhNRpxDYQ1BlTOxA5o/uSfxHx9dOdSzS8yqE yZz3cMKmMP4AHz22j4vIUpf3QnbR4U33kmNMobxdG4mJvJrvpmvgdJvCb86ld2Gaongh mW3NFyLQUvIrzG/s3LnfzZ6aWf6Vl5OIgDbN8gS1m+j81ZGZRiXCrwEcR/iqDf5mWrdp 5QuYNxuff8nGa7WBQPwvAiR6f1cVwkVQOy7FSG0LF/BwBVOyI+WcBY4OzyqUqVhz4exW VQapaEulBDwEWLkBB6t1Qt8UZbodZEADQG9pPAE8ZLiDGIM+m+/yzcGXqDEIzexQAyTi dZbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vLk4kS7W6SY0Jdl+M12Z16iagUNOOJTDpgXeFNMmUGg=; b=rz2NTiJjKrDlVtbLQ77G7dyIV3BPcUBKdg50sjQcOT6LaD21aOaA0rhyc2TKWCH1gC 4GTavtTr+DTQ48rjFdsz1OVtU/Belp3Ot17/RcJ8ViGg7bDfhvIkkpEHoQn2Ux8O/tYE HsdFqqhDtJush9AJY4dEzOLK7Mg/zD0992BCcJId6xkaizAxMSlonVjxP6ZclC+5mB54 6VT/cCiQ7okHJgh8MeUYVNNugz/sZRGnlhxKg2+tfhWg1RTkfgs7WTt4cuwY9hEaezNU 2F8tVS8woARCs6bwuVP0QPB3tMnNRsq1NBHmANGgvEa3jLCM7rw8mTfwwF+7zU3fnCq+ 46mQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohxEYNjhQNV5J5qmywD7+ywclLDkrj7I2Bdy5Mcuxl+SWNw4eLF O8HYyFPa6Ptwr9xIiyu+ogf9RWjCIkHUUF4fZk8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60ZxbU9Qw4c5TXYR7aN0D+MvUT/4TfLFaHF2BjbkFHT/cerGMkljbV1RrDEXNNOpkFxl+/FbkRovzkuD2ttqK8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2942:: with SMTP id u63-v6mr1197569lje.28.1537852436803; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dtkNjzS0DkD37SD=POtC2Nd6Xe=upyjvVoyBnnMw7qwbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANN+akb1S=eJNhSOT-e6R1yn_u20nuZNwDFEK7S90ksJ3wt95A@mail.gmail.com> <b890dedd-9f32-890f-3719-5c0c8ffa8345@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b890dedd-9f32-890f-3719-5c0c8ffa8345@gmail.com>
From: youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:13:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CANN+akZtT7dtcCLgLW9AQy+ZFuDHXxJFNxikPGBQCf7Duy0sug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003676440576ab2c85"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/lcX4xlH_6AdRueebIILDPj0-R-0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:14:01 -0000

>
> Perhaps its feasible for those use cases where the administrator is
> already aware of the software but definitely not for small applications
> such as sharedrop.io, Threema Web whose main use case is the direct
> connection in same network environments and its significant benefits
> regarding throughput.
>

I agree this is the most likely scenario where host candidates are actually
useful: two web browsers doing pure data channel on a managed/complex
network, and no coordination between the network admin being and the app.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email