Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Sat, 13 December 2014 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789F91A8867 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yt6g0xShQg5L for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C451A884E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id dc16so6008585qab.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FGzw+rKxr7lT1Ad3d6SodPYzJ+HA63xzJLQTvrogGv4=; b=IKY/Ix+5oAWyvMobMfWQq5yxBz6j9OO/ED/Kn9sZeGeyLWZzJeZ/zOhvnVHHgOLQEy u9Byqj+YuTGUVhYArRoNmpKcuiroLlWKADK1ID5XO0PRvcY+Jsx4DrH6t4Kx5zPJJtr4 hQVB86AFW3REn1V3ZqGFrJ8JmBQip7ZJk1LwAZq0Iy4mXFiGeeUhRxh0gnQYTehpyF1k E8A3K43LetAKCeyhA9TRYvB2jourg+WwtDhjMGSIzBsDBgUXID/32wJThxqgTi64lL5e vDGbOhLRVXRG4oNt8G5thQQr6l3Tc/FA0zFYLoCNv9Wsh/8q8/qR5K2w9ypqHlD0rLNF B2Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJ98Ip7V7z/YnBKF0eS59PodY6DvpMEV7qlinO4/wG6PYZUdR8F5bA5C5CUgPYDZJLSPf+
X-Received: by 10.140.92.202 with SMTP id b68mr24242157qge.10.1418432206593; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:56:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4114C519-5B41-43B5-8426-E6191398BE4D@cisco.com>
References: <4114C519-5B41-43B5-8426-E6191398BE4D@cisco.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:56:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfndoO-72k2XZ=2y8FRZL4BQ=B62v3hkYZyd=w7mhMpj2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/lo-1fcPmWvnJaRS8fgN6eQszBQ4
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:56:50 -0000

>  Since a gateway is expected to be deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address (as seen from the client), a WebRTC gateway does not need to support full ICE; it therefore MAY implement ICE-Lite only.

Even if the only useful statement defined by the draft was that, I say +1.

I support this draft so no one can request (again) that all the WebRTC
entities MUST support full ICE (which is a resource and time waste in
servers).

Thanks for this.

2014-12-04 20:29 GMT+01:00 Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>om>:
> Having reviewed the fine technical comments on this draft since we asked for comments, the chairs have noted that multiple people seem to have read the draft. Given this great news we are going make a call for adoption.
>
> If you have an opinion, please email the list by Dec 19 and let us know if you either:
>
> A) yes, draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways should be adopted as a WG document now
>
> B) no, not right now
>
> If we get consensus around A we will work with ADs on milestone. Otherwise we will encourage the authors to keep working on this draft and continue using this email list. We may adopt it later or include the text in other drafts.
>
> Thanks,
> The Chairs (Cullen, Sean, Ted)
>
> PS - if you want to send an email that says more than A or B, feel free to change the subject, start a new thread etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>