IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7313D1A00B9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zMFlmHRnyStl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74091A00B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x12so18586200wgg.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gO2/xu+xofqrr/tcmNTKVg9uCofwPvwZvHJVwQhno4c=; b=Ok/H6NWvNmOYs/9d5wqHak8zFhxAekXGEtTou1m2GVejJ+NJ8isd2X0V1uJPhLs9lB Kib33qsNblbxqZZbdyqjPcwGTE7BP+CIcivIjFzAml4Qcc/ToOO+0KBGMuLFDL+Wnn4B IZFMN6EUD3TVcGqNpBDd0+qMOW9ceJWU5Uhbg+I6eX2b3RhHYgahsEIPHti614ZmikfZ liI7JUf6WrvIE5GSWsqxNryyurAV52rowe8T4C+fc1hWLnjXrLu/YG+WqUIfkEbKG1Wv 3YrUZ7VaREdMEJ4gRMuRs0IS04U1I5TNkyICA9zQu32Bw7ZCc8pCRgtrZ/N6VG1dr5ZF hOXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnksCgkX0fU0cpqvv8qmoBwlK82pPW53CVT0MLEFQJiPzasvDvkairozpGiNoTjhFn1syLA
X-Received: by 10.194.184.199 with SMTP id ew7mr67300187wjc.85.1418769855443; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com. [74.125.82.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ex9sm18598210wib.14.2014.12.16.14.44.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l18so18627212wgh.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.2.75 with SMTP id 11mr54945569wjs.78.1418769854278; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.191.202 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:44:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <38A5EC44-7F70-4E6B-AF46-AFED895C21C3@gmail.com>
References: <548F54A5.2060105@andyet.net> <CA+9kkMDNhRdbzCs9vrqDeD4CoWWK1xS5o0z3jL0DvNpDuLfCPw@mail.gmail.com> <548F5E22.2040605@andyet.net> <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com> <548F5FB8.9010300@andyet.net> <548F646C.1050406@nostrum.com> <20141216150303.GT47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOAfuscG28PMAu8JJ4yAAt1-ohnuqCaeoa+jkpDkJhhpw@mail.gmail.com> <20141216152100.GU47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOykRm1RCupB6905AOikXrcrmeSjE45Yqf1mHL3aed2Zg@mail.gmail.com> <20141216162534.GV47023@verdi> <CABcZeBNDiDyYtv_0vZyO_mGuFi-dn4s0CXEo1agMmRSvsLNR8w@mail.gmail.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF363463@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <CAD5OKxscDvS7SURWido5k5tsVhmMwWU7kVvGqEcTSdAMkWw8Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=JP2zCWz-OD0c2DFoguaME5fWtuq67=+bkZ4syCL2mow@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B296427@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAD5OKxva4bp=6FNytHyjY5Z71Mvs=90acoygh6PLgs_GG3md5g@mail.gmail.com> <55E22C2A-EB8A-4296-A33D-A0DC10373D02@phonefromhere.com> <38A5EC44-7F70-4E6B-AF46-AFED895C21C3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:44:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtwQE=Y8ke7xhp32eF8O-4n0gpL-+w0+QsoEJ2=v_uqDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a834c2eb466050a5d1959"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/lq8PC22qJPyLnHyuPCy_lC4DFZo
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:44:18 -0000

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 4:52 PM, tim panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote:
> >
> > When does the H264/VP8 IPR expire? It is clear this discussion will be
> kept going around in circles ‘till then.
>
> [BA] Oh my. Aren't you the optimist? I fully expect the debate to continue
> beyond that point because by then we will have moved on to a debate about
> next generation MTI and how soon we can expire the existing proposal
> (assuming it isn't OBE).
>
>
The way it goes we would be discussing remote holographic presence before
this issue is resolved.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status