IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 29 January 2019 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B11C1277BB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jar32trrfZx6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A01126DBF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x85-v6so16039391ljb.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:25:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gzItv2JbE20L8Hdhvx58X+gL6sFN4zNIUwmvsybj5bE=; b=W8CjIpwB23QmH6K9VUUpf0+EK9a9KpR4VbDPonBGaOjs9kpQwJkBIZckkmb/dexpPu AUueEr/V/rmZRXg9rZExQH2b2x6hfgUJIoTUyihbiO6QIJzlh91oeRepI0SdFKoG8ndK JLGwCB467y5wM1jpnG0fH+MqCSp2QU2pcdb4nvwiePXk/IniFkPAnTcWCqED1fS67zwt sWoGGOWKOnNTMGxYu6psYvQ2zlje5/NCzFTcuxDnWIsLrOCsJK1HJxz2NC32cUikJVGK hyUFO4k0K05MixQz0kTtC/zZy5gEeOddYLGSY+1TPPfRrYzaPoDy3bbuS98En2Q/RHTA jp8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gzItv2JbE20L8Hdhvx58X+gL6sFN4zNIUwmvsybj5bE=; b=IRjQoNsPG2llzkimzbvbpPeKbVZcZdGI3o+IGxIwEOfVXfAf+k+trRNHZhJ6u7yuLA mYDL718RUpYmtxadwXiTSOCdWqU6lgw2xC+PRXeGOBc2DsuWaEAXT+gUvF9H8hwpVyAj DtAn3mZXFMhI8trcEIlWxhGWh5Ge9mTGykVJuYM8VIMGStwk4CS0/1/Q+oOo+DpSiHY6 zG6uVIk6EHtZDkeVXHPwzIZhqQX9m9qTk6SiAODaavPeG7uRT+7zxBN8/lYGtfrhD6yu GbkboAaqHeMoNcRgJuWm78X4+/BedlLLG+uG09tHVxvnjwjHsNW3XmjzTR7cZY8dSAWm dx7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdjIcGyNQDVfdK3EhqYfMp2cWe1TJ8bmECpDWOdEnP5UAelEEc+ HjifD9c5FD+SHRJzJGU9uK/b8sLUPRayDeCa4Iw7+uwV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5s5+zkLOXQ5jRJJwynD6Z2dfOJDKwGfZyN3FxKwy8oD8a7TDQtb5ZsU3mwbf8FWbkycxp1Ld0MSj3otx7Jvyk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a202:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr18812347ljm.72.1548725102380; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:25:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97ed2641-8a7e-19a9-be38-a3458ca9212e@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBP9t0SgsHAuENo99D6ffKd7Mw0Xs1vzUCOzSS=WJN5z8A@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3161B0F1D2B5AC9DA72DDFAD93950@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOJ7v-3KHi0TUDsQvG6qq-qeNGBsqLxg+NC1c+Nxvgy0ks0d0g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNL=sWFfh=zwiuib80HPsno=GzF18gU+z3DrCZTK_PquA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDh56CeXRGNSk_r-HrLkDNT5DnYc_FguXOdeccfq=LEMA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPboLf0bLUDTyJArxsPYSnUrULArmsZ9YshQCX+rEvexA@mail.gmail.com> <937eade0-f126-472a-d990-aa4b65ea5a82@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <937eade0-f126-472a-d990-aa4b65ea5a82@nostrum.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:24:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMXwNY9DyAg-5V2iQUBUiSvy_sE+7ShcjNGJu-WxDFx2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000951ef305808ea9fb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ly2Kfk7ZLQ2lE-9M5-8S9RVgNBo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 01:25:06 -0000

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> [as an individual]
>
> On 1/28/19 6:55 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > it's unnecessary complexity
>
>
> To make sure we're not all overlooking something that is obvious to you
> -- can you describe the complexity involved here?
>

Having to condition what you put in the proto line depending on the
candidates is more complexity than not having to do so.

-Ekr


> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status