Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] [art] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 07 September 2018 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D465812008A; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZK4lcviOTSx; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6826E127AC2; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id b11-v6so7496416pfo.3; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Jz+LljBeg/I1O6lXsBh9v3cWhxMRhQqzfoQVcgF4X8Y=; b=WSlYLGSqIpdaQfGSqkE/8RHN8UXP/AifyE3nLu6cNTJOPY5xOf9Gwpv57HHNb86e9S 1t1RB98S0GJuPGwlMdB+zHwgDLOPxhR6jK8QSyQkIEkIiIpiuV7Yq9qPuaRt7PvYXsCJ pBb4/8chUm+Ye3Snf6LV+ondpj5rMi1dX3xWUdjwcU5UhfhgDjtuoemHLOnlYCCMpY9S 2w04wh98QVCTYfQX/FCl0/E7J6apNBsqO4EWwX2PyOe1cxzu9eVU1Eu02p5Xr1eclgW4 6ygVA8214+Vxic6PSBZSCvAbGLPTH62ldz+OR3KAF0G93jexC60RtbSiEnlqcPGlKZdA AuWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Jz+LljBeg/I1O6lXsBh9v3cWhxMRhQqzfoQVcgF4X8Y=; b=Uh0voNIRFMwDY2PyxDfnLDZWlc1srzbuB9R0vP+fSGMHx/Nl8uOJTeC2qoIotrpNcN 04BVF40AyVaDwgjdLxaf/ATVTny1TXQfHDCN00S1VY3FSmfRod83PgyvUNe6I4COS0/C 4Zut6AxTriZwH/H467INP1ABLe5Hisw+/GnPY/g1V9+iHBwzpcjvg4XUOjaLaad14VwG fxKJCY6nQU8YQBbRc+DVdsmIXttxTFdOBIMw55izgtI/IMMB29tyGk6ssdFCsZWQSyuk 30on/b+iyT08ijnmfjGrUmBXXLefRy7cXvFMdWdbru+3mioL6tv9unrSo8UAP3O9c3J1 gF/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Aa8i0NZVkATsVGvz3zyLhnmJFkPxJwFVPlTRiZuHo91gAAfBin zgkGUtFlSVIeZG0rdD/dNZFxA1BM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY2fbyyP1e0uqvsbFjh5uRUWTkcU4iW8Aa4K5dpv1+rOU/IDc/0ed5pGwcvx9EIhW6TgpOlgQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:d2c4:: with SMTP id c187-v6mr10391835pfg.8.1536349759229; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:463a:a0c9:d578:c8bc:8de4:5575? ([2600:380:463a:a0c9:d578:c8bc:8de4:5575]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 83-v6sm13277405pft.40.2018.09.07.12.49.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <dc1d42b9ee4a425fa44976575c92ba86@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:49:17 -0700
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <670CB2D0-3861-451E-88F4-5CB7F7D8C8D0@gmail.com>
References: <15d3b114-5c04-61c4-8a62-61d8a414143d@nostrum.com> <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca> <46E40ED2-D289-4C0F-8C0B-82A5980B2692@ericsson.com> <E05D7CB4-832E-4221-ADFE-D8F317EEA8F1@iii.ca> <dc1d42b9ee4a425fa44976575c92ba86@ericsson.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/m4JKjYVvdK7Q-YqDuDOdkHSHX2Y>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] [art] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 19:49:22 -0000

On Sep 7, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; wrote:
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but WebRTC 1.0 does use trickle, and does not use aggressive nomination. Trickle is based on 8445, and aggressive nomination was deprecated in 8445. So, what exactly are you suggesting the minimum bar for WebRTC 1.0 should be?

[BA] I am wary of attempts to support too many variations in the matrix of “Full Trickle”/“Half Trickle” and 8445/5245.

IMHO, the most likely variants are “Full Trickle”/8445 and perhaps “Half Trickle”/5245 although I would hope the later will be quickly superceded by the former.