Re: [rtcweb] Open data channel issues

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15631A0DC2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8y2v-jRmsJk6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6261A0EAF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l18so2929327wgh.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 02:39:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E/THlZ99Obe1LQEYbcZcoDGv/gTewGHZQqOTjUWSTMs=; b=hmpRn6tAyxoiT9EUauFi4ClpNqoejGjVenHInUSqgI0nOw7/l0iNG/Gt8uTSY6z/mO RRrp6Rg+CRZ0jk+wgQr8V2Q2/ZcQJo2iTtjc205IXycTB0oqNBgU8+3ngCHc1mK2AEwl ZlnwIGdUvzp14G3FDy0sUWGWipwy8r26ildxU3tfkrh0RB6FTDf3QCKQVolRVQeHqNrd UiTxPH/AuGPfcirM4KpeGSQcJExnO1xmUqr9Ojo0MJtTQKS5+yotb0MHYKKcaTX6eMZq W2EyAyJRFTjSOxcB5REBqPjUzvOXiQJOelBvx/eXceVMMLRm2Icobr3CMvb1L+07WVrt Pc9Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.188.41 with SMTP id fx9mr1219210wjc.56.1393843141069; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 02:39:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:39:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <24066065-DD25-4037-B476-5FA7C9809DDE@fh-muenster.de>
References: <31B9253D-E826-4D07-A8A1-1B062B50F163@lurchi.franken.de> <530D9CC5.5080508@ericsson.com> <5312FBBC.5080006@jesup.org> <CAOJ7v-2GHt37u8raWDKquNFLCjSv-ptP0YGojPwuLv02da_m1Q@mail.gmail.com> <5313EC0D.9030808@jesup.org> <CABkgnnVRAfnrmMY57UD-0o=1Oz3==ZA8Q42mqCaxoQ27+X-orQ@mail.gmail.com> <24066065-DD25-4037-B476-5FA7C9809DDE@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:39:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX6HzX0oDdrfbLdgjLn90PzqSM1K8bHzczptbgBaHn=cg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/mCKPHwchtNLjwnRkbC8tU6v2wZw
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Open data channel issues
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:39:15 -0000

On 2 March 2014 23:01, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
> As said in my previous mail: Using NDATA will allow to have on each
> stream a single ordered or unordered message being sent in explicit
> EOR mode. The send calls can be interleaved.

That's great.  So the protocol can and is being fixed.  I think that
part of Randell's concern comes from the implementations thereof.
Those would seem to be even easier to fix.