Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion
Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 06:31 UTC
Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD3421F8569 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.64
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.64 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E+vcRrycMiHL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D446C21F8564 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so1303150vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.188.65 with SMTP id fy1mr2122034vdc.442.1317796502633; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm650089vdg.22.2011.10.04.23.35.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so1308517vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.36.203 with SMTP id s11mr1886087vdj.453.1317796501618; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.178.74 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E8BC56E.40306@skype.net>
References: <4E8B192E.80809@ericsson.com> <CALiegfmnxO+BrfycOmL=hptBFdcEpsLeBn=zsJTX=ivKBBumWw@mail.gmail.com> <BLU152-W139AA2913C1CFFDB50726193FB0@phx.gbl> <BLU152-W2342F5823933FA1F2B9F9C93FB0@phx.gbl> <37C37EE6-3D48-4C77-A025-3207F040572B@cisco.com> <4E8BC56E.40306@skype.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:35:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtavopQma+-7t91DYDJ_HNyw-nRMOUXArr=8ya_QViJwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3079ba2e5d81c404ae876856"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:31:56 -0000
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>wrote: > I think what he's concerned about is that a device might consent (using > ICE) to receive audio and unexpectedly receive multiplexed video on the same > RTP port. > > Not sure this really matters, as there's not much difference between > low-frame-rate low-res video and 16-bit linear stereo PCM at 48 kHz (which > might indeed be an audio codec you can choose). > Since we already agreed that RTC end point does not need to interact with anything except other RTC end points, and everything outside RTC would just be extended to support it, why would not we add additional parameters to STUN connectivity check? We can add media types, rates, codecs and codec parameters to STUN request and let the end point only accept the connectivity check if the media matches what's expected to be sent to this IP/port. This will probably even work with existing ICE implementations, if we make these codec parameters comprehension-optional. _____________ Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Randell Jesup
- [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Cary Bran (cbran)
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Paul Hoffman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion sebastien.cubaud
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism (Re… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… sebastien.cubaud
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion sebastien.cubaud
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… sebastien.cubaud
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Sebastien Cubaud's non-ICE mechanism… sebastien.cubaud
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion sebastien.cubaud