Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)
"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com> Fri, 13 December 2013 05:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mzanaty@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659F91AE658 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0EmN-u9eQVw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664261AE656 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:40:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15571; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386913244; x=1388122844; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1oatX3Loi3+Zgf8ZHSl24f2+2RhkFXAoekeCG7+CidE=; b=IvC4VM4ZdrIPKjiRggBL8bWmvaIwsXogNRZfEeYqQ43Jt0EctHDUi2Pj tPnmcq7W9do0k0wWrCMn7cda2YFhFBBewaT4UsIg4jACdXgEKCYae2zIy hxVcNxerjyDoxYbzEkuFj768w3b8FinxMyXgH0Twep2Aaq4ve4Um+pZoT k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAPOcqlKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgkZEOFW4EU6BHhZ0giUBAQEDAQEBARpREAcEAgEIEQQBAQEnBycLFAkIAgQBEgmHcwgNwkMXjj5UCwaEMASYFYEwkGSDKoFoQg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,477,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="6478409"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2013 05:40:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBD5ehw1013570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:40:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.19]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:40:43 -0600
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
To: Ron <ron@debian.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)
Thread-Index: AQHO98XcmB5H7/61LkGaMs34jm1qUQ==
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:40:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CECFF758.205FF%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <20131212011550.GM3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <E8882BCE-4795-4CF5-B785-18C2141A5DE2@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxvy8xGuiR7oUbJJwTaxGfPJ=MHpd8Hp5MfpPLy8LmNaQg@mail.gmail.com> <D5A2C5EC-C65F-4E39-9A56-315B94C5FB1D@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxs-OoqwbQgBy7K4wQRffCk0=8Qmo_xJQdSwhBL2F85v1g@mail.gmail.com> <20131212214310.GR3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CECFA3EA.AC30E%stewe@stewe.org> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F8739@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <20131213024334.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F88D6@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <20131213033344.GW3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20131213033344.GW3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.82.253.208]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CECFF758205FFmzanatyciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:40:53 -0000
The confusion here is that the VP8 bitstream is defined in IETF (RFC 6386). So there are IETF IPR declarations on that (from Google and Nokia). The H.264 bitstream is defined in ISO/IEC/ITU but not IETF. So there are ISO/IEC/ITU IPR declarations on that (from many, not just MPEG-LA licensors), but there are no IETF IPR declarations since there is no IETF bitstream spec, just protocol specs that wrap or use the bitstream in opaque ways but don’t define it in any way. You can see the ISO/IEC/ITU IPR declarations here: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/governance_of_technical_work/patents.htm (The AVC standard is called H.264 in ITU and MPEG-4 Part 10 or 14496-10 in ISO/IEC.) Note that IPR declarations are just that, a declaration, not verified in any way by any SDO as being a valid claim necessary to implement a standard. Mo On 12/12/13, 10:33 PM, Ron <ron@debian.org<mailto:ron@debian.org>> wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:03:12AM +0000, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: Well lets turn the question around then. Which document contains the requirement that makes H.264 an essential part of its content, such that you would make an IPR declaration against it? Including but not limited to ?: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=webrtc+draft+h264 And if you think this applies to H.264, where is the related VP8 disclosure, which following your reasoning, is also required? However, the requirement for an IPR disclosure is satisfied by a blanket statement of the IPR discloser's willingness to license all of its potential IPR meeting the requirements of Section 6.6 (and either Section 6.1.1 or 6.1.2) to implementers of an IETF specification on a royalty-free basis ... Which is not to say at all that I'm arguing there shouldn't also be further disclosures there too if you can point to something that says the above doesn't already cover it. Does that answer your questions, or are we going to do "Mom! He hit me!!" next? Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron > Sent: 13 December 2013 02:44 > To: rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > Subject: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof) > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:30:32AM +0000, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > > If Ron can justify such a statement, the he is also in > defiance of the > > IETF IPR rules, because he himself is required to make a > disclosure. > > The requirement is to disclose if you know of..., not if you own. > > Maybe you should actually go read the Note Well RFCs before > you engage in "No U" argumentation that just makes it look > like you haven't. > > If I owned, or worked for or on behalf of anyone who owned > IPR that was relevant to the work here, I indeed would have > disclosed it according to the obligations noted there. > > Since I don't, and I don't actually know specific details of > which patents might apply here (beyond reading of assertions > there is a pool, and of court cases that are being pursued > over them, and that many of the people pushing hard for the > adoption of H.264 are holders of them) - I am indeed > discharging the only obligation upon me that I SHOULD point and wave. > > > But I believe Stefan is correct. Neither IETF or its > contributors has > > not written a document specifying the H.264 codec as an > essential part > > of its operation, therefore making a disclosure is not required. If > > IETF progresses to making a statement that incorporation of > an H.264 > > implementation forms an essential part of a webrtc > specification, then > > disclosure in IETF will be required. > > "Covers or may ultimately Cover a Contribution" > > I believe is the language used. > > "unless ... rejected from consideration before a disclosure > could reasonably > be submitted." > > And I'm pretty sure we're well past the time of "could > reasonably", unless your position is that we should now > immediately reject it from consideration? > > > > ISO/IEC JTC1 does have a specification for H.264, and I am led to > > believe disclosures of IPR have been made there. Noone involved in > > this discussion as far as I am aware is hiding H.264 IPR. Again I > > believe as a third party, you are also allowed to make IPR > disclosures > > there (certainly every other SDO I know of allows third > party disclosures). > > > > And before this degenerates into a discussion of what > people want the > > IETF IPR rules to become rather than what they are, take > that to the > > IETF discussion list. > > "Contributors must disclose IPR meeting the description in > this section; > there are no exceptions to this rule." > > Nobody is arguing for a change to the rules here. It's the > blatant disregard for them (or perhaps you are trying to > subtly demonstrate that it's simply ignorance of them) which > is what concerns me at the present time. > > I'd prefer to just see this remedied by the people who the > obligation falls upon than to make an example of them before > the wider IETF. > If it goes that far I would assume it will be with a call for > sanctions. > > > Stephan may still be correct that there is some sneaky back > door that people can hide behind here - but if there is one, > all that you've proved in these statements is that you don't > know what it is either. > > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implement… Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ethan Hugg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Max Jonas Werner
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Paul Giralt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Paul Giralt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open so… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to ope… Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to ope… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to ope… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lac… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… SM
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 imple… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR di… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… SM
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… bryandonnovan
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… bryandonnovan
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Silvia Pfeiffer
- [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open sourc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IP… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to ope… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open s… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open s… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open s… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we lear… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we lear… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we lear… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we lear… Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we lear… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what… Martin Thomson