IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E2721F971B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2pd5lOqh6Ll for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AB021F9717 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r3PM6CW7027483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:06:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r3PM6Bhw007431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:06:12 -0500
Received: from [135.244.42.169] ([135.244.42.169]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r3PM6BQX015821; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:06:11 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <5179A8D3.4080706@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:06:11 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca> <20130425202238.74EF321F96A5@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48416281FDB@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48416281FDB@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:06:14 -0000

+1 (From someone who had proposed this, as an option, 100,000 messages 
before)

Igor
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Bogineni, Kalyani
>> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:21 PM
>> To: 'Cullen Jennings'; rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
>>
>> We would like to support the use of SDES as a keying method for WebRTC.
>>
>> Kalyani Bogineni
>> Verizon
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
>> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:57 AM
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
>>
>>
>> The working groups committed some time ago to have a further discussion
>> on whether SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568 aka SDES) would be usable
>> as a keying method for WebRTC.  As we prepare for that discussion, we'd like
>> to have expressions of interest or support for that approach which indicate
>> the general outlines of support proposed.  If you wish to make such an
>> expression of support, please send it to the chairs or the list.
>>
>> Cullen, Magnus,&  Ted<The Chairs>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email