[rtcweb] Codec draft - VP8 description
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 09 November 2011 06:55 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8218521F8C30 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:55:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfa1DoQfUpY4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:55:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1393321F8C2D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380AA39E123 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:54:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3edurvAiUvpw for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:54:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (c213-89-141-213.bredband.comhem.se [213.89.141.213]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA5C39E04C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:54:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EBA23C0.2060606@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:54:56 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [rtcweb] Codec draft - VP8 description
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:55:00 -0000
Hi,
the codec draft currently says about VP8:
o If VP8, then MUST support a the bilinear and none reconstruction
filters
I've checked with our VP8 people, and they say that subset
implementations of VP8 are STRONGLY discouraged; any decoders should be
capable of decoding all modes defined.
I suggest just removing the sentence.
Harald
- [rtcweb] Codec draft - VP8 description Harald Alvestrand