Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 15:17 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3C021F8549 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1qp9XZEA1IA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E7521F86DC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkuw5 with SMTP id w5so2298495bku.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=agV5dKZdymG0YtHIpBQKXG33LLNp2bvsB36GyzXfJ0Y=; b=pr8xoLoFSplWEgWheJbk6emzKIcEEaPTdca3EqHpsTXS5Zfr+VUh/mY0oIjYm0TmsT eMUwf7sPEfASrK9tj44cDzqU3c8SUwQBfc8R/Zjl8FtABvB0DTQqk872bmwwG8LjLXjs KmKAhNyQRgVdMiu9Vf/eoasES01spsRJhMgE+ClDrCrKbIpMz93PSMLwsIr6y5knMHgY 6hKjrhgR3OzOEPOPuS3uSABeNJOkR74W5XVFQ4Tpf/Rmx+PMxdovad1ezZy3Ye5uThLb E19K9jfA/oM03CWeGzc8G2gLZLj0oEcLZ2U2FyTdul+2X4FzMNpY7d/sIAZO6MQy6a6U bU+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.153.215 with SMTP id l23mr14066836bkw.11.1333034238084; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.38.73 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <snt0-p7-eas105C385419C114651AEC86A93480@phx.gbl>
References: <CABkgnnWwaAgF5YQ0dP45yeYetRjBuuSt2C9epHtcTcUqeRkd+g@mail.gmail.com> <blu0-P2-EAS10401F750CA9A684CE265C93480@phx.gbl> <CABkgnnVC3122KOgbhsj5Ag=UwtscxDBAb-MOfHdCjh+K6FOrkg@mail.gmail.com> <snt0-p7-eas105C385419C114651AEC86A93480@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:17:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVrndCW9Let+EkM4yqn0zRv9QAC=+W4GuiGnMu6czXR2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:17:31 -0000
On 29 March 2012 16:03, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote: > While they would be perceived as different with first party IdP, a signed assertion is still meaningless without some proof that the E.164 number is actually owned by the domain making the assertion. Yes, if you infer that it is an E.164. I wouldn't have inferred that it was an E.164 number because I know that you can't make those sorts of assertions - it's just a string @ a domain.
- [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust Martin Thomson