Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5694721F8AD3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kO3DZzZttW5v for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E1321F8AD2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=301; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318972424; x=1320182024; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CmgGcI9r3VyeMR1c0QjQVyL2W74gZWypWCVRkwTrG7s=; b=biI3JFwraz6WsGimBFw5Och/U6eDH/4+EVYXuvl8QHwGB2PNRRO/CHGL qJFZ9kNq8C/+eys9xDjhLC0VvpwLCxvXhzgKdK951MA/vifWxrGuZ5kg4 LWT8wVb7tZsrrskrofetg7IMzmO5lb3/2TjtYBR2Ma7GdDu+oxrlj598Z s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMjrnU6tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEqG6BBYFuAQEBAwESASc/BQsLRlcGNYdel3YBnkiHOmEEiAKLe5F2
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,366,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="29341471"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2011 21:13:43 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-70-217-213.cisco.com (dhcp-171-70-217-213.cisco.com [171.70.217.213]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9ILDghw028204; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:13:43 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJUQMg=njg6SLBnLrQhN8kqyn8Y55Ghmv8YYpzfP6rmUanmBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:13:42 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1DEFCFF8-4F23-4D84-914D-AB50233C8C06@cisco.com>
References: <4E9D667A.2040703@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMhUh5XiFh8rpg=Xag_F_Vm5tuVE5yRnArxzcd6sXb-=Kw@mail.gmail.com> <4E9DBECC.6000206@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMg=njg6SLBnLrQhN8kqyn8Y55Ghmv8YYpzfP6rmUanmBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:13:44 -0000

On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:29 , Wolfgang Beck wrote:

> Depressingly few SIP providers do interconnection, after all those
> years.

Interesting - most the people I seem to deal with need to send SIP from one domain to another. Who are you thinking of that does not need to do interconnect?