Re: [rtcweb] Repair Flows and No Plan (Was: No Plan)

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Tue, 04 June 2013 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B99521F9990 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2GexOoPM9AR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2A21F994D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hn14so4355013wib.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LALFycJJkcfgbmcfjenejqLs3AopBNspPi9XIJ0h8zI=; b=nxNoJ79SMzBSS88BumHdNS/U9Uq6Kh6bmCobPRkt9a7kOWpgAPhf0h8Mon4GbCu5vY gtxczPBC22wqqetgz8yonFE6nLGLvnjdeKftQXVayS2hlwd0RCsbFdI+U+q4LO50BsPk HMiyxlaPr80Q4IVEoky3hqhoLISJJK9NX+Uxzdx+EPOeGDj9L8Rfy0n25225P0S47/KD QgXvo3Sd2EKC2T5ASx/hEsWaHH2WsbrEhNUD181jsA0OwicIUGGoRbJwfujcaosdNhoJ qK/p+PYQrrU1fwsv7ex9DdDg9V1pM5CH+N88va5HtR1r3JvGNaesyXtkmEbyxGQfy+r7 OTQQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.198.49 with SMTP id iz17mr3517903wic.39.1370383985113; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([90.165.216.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eq15sm5791994wic.4.2013.06.04.15.13.03 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51AE6671.7060309@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:13:05 +0200
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <51A65017.4090502@jitsi.org>, <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37D144@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, , <51A9A7E2.7000907@jitsi.org>, <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C380AA2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <51ACFF31.9090607@alum.mit.edu>, <7426877E-42ED-400A-A264-39C692E71308@vidyo.com> <BLU169-W1201BB755F15FB7A1EF5E4A939D0@phx.gbl> <51ADD69E.2000708@jitsi.org>
In-Reply-To: <51ADD69E.2000708@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Repair Flows and No Plan (Was: No Plan)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:13:06 -0000

El 04/06/2013 13:59, Emil Ivov escribió:
>
> I might be wrong but I don't think any of the WebRTC supporting 
> browsers currently send repair flows which is why all this is still 
> hypothetical and now is probably the right time to think about it.

IIRC, Chrome  encapsulates VP8 and FEC packets inside RED packets and 
then send them using the same SSRC.

Best regards
Sergio