IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Brent Kelly <bkelly@kelcor.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bkelly@kelcor.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFD01AE061; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:53:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id By5WQ9_JzzyB; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0203.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.203]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128B1AE05E; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.166.144) by CO1PR06MB240.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.166.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.825.14; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:53:27 +0000
Received: from CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.244]) by CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.244]) with mapi id 15.00.0837.004; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:53:27 +0000
From: Brent Kelly <bkelly@kelcor.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHO9TcfwIgJBT3soUmi7i6fPrIgGJpMlgNQgAADawCAAABrsA==
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:53:27 +0000
Message-ID: <a33851d8030144d8b70d53cb181bf936@CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441927F3A@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <7c751cfece3f4ab7941a8f2e38c4cb9b@CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnUxuoDeYWA11XsZq4dXGio7i+Oepr0ATp75aADKs=u2zg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUxuoDeYWA11XsZq4dXGio7i+Oepr0ATp75aADKs=u2zg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.123.38.38]
x-forefront-prvs: 005671E15D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(252514010)(189002)(199002)(71364002)(377454003)(24454002)(54356001)(19609705001)(69226001)(15975445006)(87266001)(77096001)(74876001)(53806001)(74706001)(76786001)(49866001)(2656002)(74502001)(47976001)(90146001)(4396001)(76576001)(56816005)(76796001)(83322001)(80022001)(80976001)(15202345003)(47446002)(81342001)(74662001)(56776001)(19580405001)(16236675002)(19580395003)(59766001)(74316001)(77982001)(74366001)(87936001)(66066001)(51856001)(76482001)(85306002)(79102001)(81816001)(47736001)(81542001)(50986001)(81686001)(19300405004)(31966008)(63696002)(46102001)(33646001)(54316002)(65816001)(85852003)(83072002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR06MB240; H:CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:129.123.38.38; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a33851d8030144d8b70d53cb181bf936CO1PR06MB238namprd06pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kelcor.com
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:53:38 -0000

Maybe the poll should be to get consensus on whether to have a MTI codec vote “at this moment”. ☺

Kind regards,
E. Brent Kelly, Ph.D.
Principal Analyst/Consultant

KelCor, Inc.
tel: +1 435 563 2532
email: bkelly@kelcor.com<mailto:bkelly@kelcor.com> | web: www.kelcor.com<http://www.kelcor.com/>

twitter: @ebkell | blog: www.uccinsider.blogspot.com<http://www.uccinsider.blogspot.com/>

From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 5:51 PM
To: Brent Kelly
Cc: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE); Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org; Gonzalo Camarillo; Richard Barnes; Magnus Westerlund; Cullen Jennings; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives


On 9 December 2013 16:41, Brent Kelly <bkelly@kelcor.com<mailto:bkelly@kelcor.com>> wrote:
1.       See if there is group consensus on whether or not to take a vote.

One might choose to infer that there is not consensus to proceed with a vote.  Though that might be tempered by adding "...at this moment."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email