IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 31 March 2014 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDBD1A0A18 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6-kBxXHdgRC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61AC1A09F1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C537C50C6; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:40:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4v6Ok1Mu0uM; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:40:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.6.166] (62.43.192.217.static.user.ono.com [62.43.192.217]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BB127C50BD; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:40:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53397036.5050104@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:40:06 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
References: <5304829E.20809@ericsson.com> <5304FC27.807@alvestrand.no> <530C74A1.3000203@ericsson.com> <5338829B.3020505@alvestrand.no> <5339385D.6070006@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5339385D.6070006@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/njCvqAiqK4svd3r9VOh_riVJwgI
Subject: [rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:40:25 -0000

Version -03 is now published. I hope you like it!

New outstanding item:

I added requirements for implementations to be able to generate both
fully bundled (one 5-tuple for everything) and fully unbundled (one
5-tuple for each flow) configurations, and for implementations to be
able to tolerate being hit with any combination of bundling schemes.

Is there a need to specify at MUST, SHOULD or MAY levels other combinations?

Harald

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email