IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415011A8713 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:26:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJY8iccYBgU6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:26:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-p01.blackberry.com (smtp-p01.blackberry.com [208.65.78.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CA31A86EC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xct107cnc.rim.net ([10.65.161.207]) by mhs211cnc.rim.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 16 Dec 2014 14:26:14 -0500
Received: from XMB111CNC.rim.net ([fe80::fcd6:cc6c:9e0b:25bc]) by XCT107CNC.rim.net ([fe80::b815:71ef:9f8f:e07c%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:26:13 -0500
From: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
Thread-Index: AQHQGK9hz+EPVQM3202R+pzBLk6Ke5yRiFAAgAAEJwCAAAEZAIAAAMsAgAAFmwCAARFEgIAAAWIAgAADogCAAAQ5gIAADdEAgAAHm4D//9TVIA==
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:26:13 +0000
Message-ID: <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF363463@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
References: <548F54A5.2060105@andyet.net> <CA+9kkMDNhRdbzCs9vrqDeD4CoWWK1xS5o0z3jL0DvNpDuLfCPw@mail.gmail.com> <548F5E22.2040605@andyet.net> <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com> <548F5FB8.9010300@andyet.net> <548F646C.1050406@nostrum.com> <20141216150303.GT47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOAfuscG28PMAu8JJ4yAAt1-ohnuqCaeoa+jkpDkJhhpw@mail.gmail.com> <20141216152100.GU47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOykRm1RCupB6905AOikXrcrmeSjE45Yqf1mHL3aed2Zg@mail.gmail.com> <20141216162534.GV47023@verdi> <CABcZeBNDiDyYtv_0vZyO_mGuFi-dn4s0CXEo1agMmRSvsLNR8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNDiDyYtv_0vZyO_mGuFi-dn4s0CXEo1agMmRSvsLNR8w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.160.251]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF363463XMB111CNCrimnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/oPxuuWAATVAON3MuAPztgMvicfg
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:26:22 -0000

From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:53 AM
To: John Leslie
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI


   Sean is specifically saying the "trigger" should be discussed
on-list.

I don't read this this way at all, Rather he's saying that in the future we
can update the RFC. But yes, we can discuss the trigger on-list. Do you
have some substantive objection that wasn't raised in HNL and/or
hasn't been discussed to death here?

 I think what has not been discussed is a differentiated text for both codecs.
VP8 to be deprecated if failing to meet RF statements from proponents
H264 to be deprecated when not used anymore by legacy services in accordance with H264 proponents statements

Gaëlle

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status