[rtcweb] Scheduling a separate slot for MTI VC Disuccions (Was: Plan for MTI video codec?)

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Sun, 19 October 2014 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEF71A6F6E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7ORECBl1mPh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4CBC1A0101 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h11so7508816wiw.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1VxyrPQfhsMdOxVb4pP1IsNGCxDzBoCzi/hKKnAD0UA=; b=CWUEgT+C4jZZIdCZpBLOgsz4UJ2tRY10cCBwafQ34fK9+N2sKN9DHmOFbDZvPvaLdK lA5+4jAT7v+XaXDvocyoL1c4xBErIJGpzW46DG+2VAKFNETUaUbxZkjfkwc+2bj1XAY5 bD4j3cXecO9XLmnSjrnmFWylT7W7yFKwKUyZTYbHkz2C0a3+b8IKpvzv0USvfKsEfSgi zwxdzJwCgw4z0JJGfpvZKhVj1U1P7SkRiuk48WHhq1VH3plrHQmEYiFRNVuSEaWJTPu3 lDFWubiHaF16fa3iSAVxQR2x3KVau3LnEzbvwANGjOZETc3BXo/d54TvepeQMw/7uVXZ yCFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVh5yIzsY7de1d3MrGrf/0tocgq5jLxveahSD7MMLppWjF0gWO0sOUMAOxyBahLRkps2qs
X-Received: by 10.194.236.200 with SMTP id uw8mr27809906wjc.50.1413747582411; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.21] (9.6.69.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.69.6.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fq1sm7162994wib.12.2014.10.19.12.39.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54441380.6070900@jitsi.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:39:44 +0200
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RTCWEB Working Group <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <CAGTXFp-HVJDwd86207PNM2QVYO4Z_K4WF-KarnRs1fb7nvy4zA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGTXFp-HVJDwd86207PNM2QVYO4Z_K4WF-KarnRs1fb7nvy4zA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/oTzgI74woM296qCGKIlBWNG7FZM
Subject: [rtcweb] Scheduling a separate slot for MTI VC Disuccions (Was: Plan for MTI video codec?)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:39:46 -0000

Given how:

a) a big number of people have indicated their concern that codec 
discussions would steal time away from other important topics that need 
to be progressed and how

b) a second group of people seem to consider it important to have a 
discussion on developments around deployment, adoption and 
standardization of VP8 and H.264

then wouldn't it be reasonable to try and allocate an extra slot for an 
ad hoc meeting on the MTI Video Codec topic?

Emil

-- 
https://jitsi.org