Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 26 December 2012 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8C621F8CFB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:14:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.269
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.269 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.330, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kkLvjP1z-61 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:14:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D3A21F8CF3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:14:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=975; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1356556474; x=1357766074; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=amHfch7BLstN3NSFXj//f3hLu16Uh1mEw9zOark01eU=; b=CQF1WCTjCfbmHUUGotGpxMS7UTvtDbF4STTHfzsAL+S2ZBiMgGQUY5x2 Y+xpZTjeGpWlKrihHig4g6sFFaAvKZE//m7ebFRo8nww1rVFFix1T5vIz SchKx62qjiXMLu+WtIfBo3XJTks5gNvVt5rVyoXzasUdZkL0OIHK4/A+y 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYFADRo21CtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABFhXO3bhZzgh4BAQEDAQEBARpsAgEIDgoKJDIlAgMBARIIiAUGtTmMV4NiYQOmVIJ0giI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,359,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="156683065"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Dec 2012 21:14:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBQLEXGX022266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:14:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.230]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([173.37.183.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:14:33 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
Thread-Index: AQHN463/CbeSbDi/ukOQqVVSt4Wdzw==
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:14:32 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113323A20@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7623356EF@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <50D3E3BF.7070609@mozilla.com> <50D48DD8.3050702@nostrum.com> <5BEDD27D-B359-4CD4-B01C-427E6BB1372A@standardstrack.com> <BC1E5A0D-68B9-4F84-95D7-A2324923C88C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC1E5A0D-68B9-4F84-95D7-A2324923C88C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.167]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <E9FB5C0E2E7F2C4DA0056CC627260E6C@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:14:34 -0000

On Dec 26, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 25, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> We then either have a nice big section in this present document describing the current state of the art of various networks with various codecs *OR* we have an Informational Implementor's Guide that describes the current state of the art of various networks, as well as the pitfalls of popular but hard codecs, like G.722.
> 
> Would someone be willing to summarize a list of codecs that at some people have argued strongly in favor of along with the main advantage of thawing that codec. I'm thinking of a list that looks something like
> 
> AMR-WB   Gets you interop with existing 3GPP 
> 
> Having a list like this would be a handy quick references to discussion.
> 
> 

Change  "thawing"  to "having" in above

(Curse you autocorrect)