IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-04.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 29 January 2014 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AE01A02DD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqmSetsWQD7x for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526911A0276 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l18so8692000wgh.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1Ps8NK2dmcPtzUtxKxynYf3jTGVdO4b9WF4aFiPl0Hg=; b=RRDwV5d2/Gk7vXfv2KVH68EWOyLXFE7m2KrBhWxozwkSB1YYAgsn9/6MPS2eJeR4or SsB4zNPbUfZYqJUIxsROfxH330awYaO02KSuRy1OQso9h60SSe61HmZNAJryutf94qLL B5TQx6EdSBrqWhSl7gibBSFZLsYqmiFzclLU2cZRZEBNYPpzuqXdrS40Zj/qq9r08APf SNYc6rUoECoiQ8sskNFrQv6A5DylH3VqG2s8ClBufoShAZtl/yMwXRjqsVY83wdUqnb5 TRv9WQZ3rh0NTM+Dqxn+VcBkYrfmaDC5TXtlEUrnn+B9EZzMGx6KhD7lI9ayNfrA303y oKVA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr6560073wiw.56.1391017569823; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.145.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E8C2CA.4070406@ericsson.com>
References: <20140127222521.21490.65090.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52E8C2CA.4070406@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:46:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX6aLgyFLT+76ci7akQsoVkHM0hE1rpKrySzp1wO5MFRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-04.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:46:14 -0000

On 29 January 2014 00:58, Magnus Westerlund
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> values are like, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 ms.

I know this is in 3551, but is anyone realistically going to do
anything as high as 120?  It's PCMU after all and the only reason I'm
aware of for going even as high as 20ms is to keep the packetization
overheads down.

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status