IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Isolating data channels (Re: Asking TLS for help with media isolation)

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 07 April 2014 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6D21A0256 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16WDmPpQkVRv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023771A081F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a1so7443052wgh.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E8m5p5Bj2IM4HncK3xdNvBbn3YxsRThFs6hOmjJTd3s=; b=MQ70m8wf8GSN6kqt+3gEmIfuFl8sCaoLanY81rxJC0ttxHwiFn8QMF5l7HovLOBbAV N+NOnOI9Ghoe7eWDxo0AH9+QH2O/9TSOkwhvsU7Sry+3gBfSJk4vxyoZxytNThOnRbmC EWSd/JrcktB8US8XZeNG1RYlS/Q/lU18v+oioejs5DHTGeKbfxG+jKGPJ51MjXpRbZ2F /Oy6vIimsXFVLu86QGBg2681G1gw6yAzRDxCHEO+KM9cwNz1cApyD4YOsZ2VZR1Huh6P UZYMf+QbeuDdw6sZPHHxjGlikTOrB7RHqEIS3Qu1TvnYAi607sQXaBuEKGVRdgjF2JM9 sobg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.149.143 with SMTP id ua15mr138431wib.36.1396899128627; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.10.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484504B505E@TK5EX14MBXC298.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <CABkgnnWWuU63Vd=gw+wrh2ADgVYtQzhoRzRE1sv5azJE=MhWDg@mail.gmail.com> <533F191D.8050109@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnVht5EmJ7a2LDh50ivjUdoTpJ8GannQKReBSJbVGQGmgA@mail.gmail.com> <53425BAF.4070105@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnXKe65-30qkuhkCLmaUYVfe8vrWv9BCJzOvC7KaRwUH=g@mail.gmail.com> <5342DE6F.6040306@alvestrand.no> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484504B4D9C@TK5EX14MBXC298.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5342FABC.4080200@alum.mit.edu> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484504B505E@TK5EX14MBXC298.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:32:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4N4T+xj_fMUQeYAL0Z=+iQ2z0uMbuDDg+ASV3mgceq3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c38e7059564204f678ec9c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/o_27XX08fe0DfDKnoInElXwA7Fc
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Isolating data channels (Re: Asking TLS for help with media isolation)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:32:20 -0000

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <
matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> > Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 12:22 PM
> > To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Isolating data channels (Re: Asking TLS for help
> with
> > media isolation)
> >
> > On 4/7/14 1:27 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
> > >
> > > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Harald
> > >> Alvestrand
> > >> ...
> > >> (and to Matthew: At least we wouldn't have *yet* another congestion
> > >> context to manage, which would be the case with a separate TCP
> > connection.
> > >> There are always tradeoffs.)
> > >
> > > If it was me (and at one time, it was) I would use a protocol that
> allows for
> > multiplexing and prioritization of media and data channels over the same
> > secure session with shared congestion state. Over such a protocol,
> opening
> > another data stream for this purpose could be done immediately without
> > even a round trip.
> > >
> > > RFC 7016 documents such an approach.
> >
> > I see that the title starts with "Adobe's". Sigh.
>
> Yes, but there's little stopping many of these ideas from becoming the
> basis for an IETF-developed transport protocol that actually meets the
> needs we have here.
>

[MB] Except, maybe, IPR:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp
[/MB]

> > If you want to entertain something other than existing solutions for
> media,
> > why not simply run the RTP media streams over SCTP along with the data
> > channels?
>
> Except for some critical shortcomings of SCTP (which are being fixed),
> this isn't actually a terrible idea.
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email