[rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Tue, 01 November 2011 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186B411E8097 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IveLVzYSlmde for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2043E11E8082 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pool-173-49-135-74.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([173.49.135.74] helo=[192.168.1.12]) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1RL4s2-0008GO-85; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:18:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4EAF64FF.8020101@jesup.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:18:23 -0400
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Subject: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:18:41 -0000

A new version of I-D, draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt has been successfully
submitted by Randell Jesup and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-jesup-rtcweb-data
Revision:	 01
Title:		 RTCWeb Datagram Connection
Creation date:	 2011-10-31
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 16

Abstract:
    This document investigates the possibilities for designing a generic
    transport service that allows Web Browser to exchange generic data in
    a peer to peer way.  Several, already standardized by IETF, transport
    protocols and their properties are investigated in order to identify
    the most appropriate one.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt


Changes include:

- small typos correction

- tried to clarify in the Abstract that we are investigating the usage
of IETF standardized protocols for the WebRTC data service

- added some more text to Section 4.1 describing the different
standardized DCCP CC

- added the Justin contribution (now in Sections 4.3.1 and 4.4)

- added the Cullen contribution in Section 5.1

- added in section 4.2 the fact that SCTP supports PPID feature (as
suggested by Randal Stewart)

- include the result of the list discussion related to Requirements

- summarize the discussion on DTLS/SCTP vs SCTP/DTLS and include ICE in
the stack picture


Not yet incorporated in the draft:

- Text about congestion control options and how that interacts with
SCTP's changeable congestion mechanisms.