IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

"Coban, Muhammed" <mcoban@qti.qualcomm.com> Sun, 12 January 2014 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcoban@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE601AE013 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:16:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJfZzxDf6NZ0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2507D1AE010 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:16:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1389554184; x=1421090184; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=veqNDymNKGiIvFPEkzCxAs36QwyhK8ONftIVr4+An38=; b=gR/SmEEarg5CfpChAiFRSJpB1y8zR6d7E8W8h351qkx73KHSuhbBIy+w hciKSNzgYcyglL+VgH9venXAVaQ8ZF3XLY+0xO91lJTMLUOUbDj2gv/bB SfN8/qvYhbiATodbXIgrkp50Q4mskBQLkaXkPKiDWiFeSKouuAM1EKlQI k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7316"; a="98267063"
Received: from ironmsg03-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.18]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2014 11:16:24 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7316"; a="600462673"
Received: from nasanexhc10.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.3]) by Ironmsg03-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Jan 2014 11:16:21 -0800
Received: from NASANEXD01A.na.qualcomm.com ([169.254.1.172]) by nasanexhc10.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.3]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:16:20 -0800
From: "Coban, Muhammed" <mcoban@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHO9QOT80hQMvxyCkeC8Uje+bGkrpqBlxrw
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:16:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D812A273FE24EE479A15DA1DC3FBA8FD5B8F276A@nasanexd01a.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [199.106.115.192]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D812A273FE24EE479A15DA1DC3FBA8FD5B8F276Anasanexd01anaqu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:16:37 -0000

Dear all,



Here is my input:



1.    All entities MUST support H.264

a.    Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Yes

b.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:



2.    All entities MUST support VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

VP8 has not completed an open standardization process. VP8 does not allow interoperability with existing solutions.



3.    All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

VP8 has not completed an open standardization process. VP8 does not allow interoperability with existing solutions.



4.    Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

VP8 has not completed an open standardization process. VP8 does not allow interoperability with existing solutions.



5.    All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

Does not provide interoperability.



6.    All entities MUST support H.261

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

Does not provide sufficient bandwidth efficiency and is not widely supported.



7.    There is no MTI video codec

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:



8.    All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

See #6 above.



9.    All entities MUST support Theora

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

Not widely supported.



10.  All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

See #5, #6 above.



11.  All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263}

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

Option 13 is cleaner.



12.  All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

See #3 above.



13.  All entities MUST support H.263

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Yes

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:



14.  All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

See #2, #5, #9 above.



15.  All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

See #9, not clear why support only decoding.



16.  All entities MUST support Motion JPEG

.      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable

a.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:

Best regards,

Muhammed Coban

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email