Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C54C1AE1D8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZ9zf3eyVY_r for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8AE1AE199 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-vpn2-1025.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2B9922E25C; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:28:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVdQJyjvNOoN7-NRsP0c=tOH3EwcnixrVa4pKQmTvgxjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:29:16 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DC209B19-7895-4C2C-9B07-F50D5445B778@iii.ca>
References: <528E69E2.9020208@librevideo.org> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7E0@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <CAOJ7v-151K2UoeMOhY-UUDzZwE=89qzbAQdrhQXYb72W+ZxQOw@mail.gmail.com> <3249225E-6709-4022-88CF-75020C1A4CEC@iii.ca> <CABkgnnVdQJyjvNOoN7-NRsP0c=tOH3EwcnixrVa4pKQmTvgxjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:28:54 -0000

On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On 21 November 2013 14:14, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:
>> I'll note that some people strongly disagree with this is not a technical decision but there are others who do think it is is no longer a technical decision.
> 
> Is that a chair statement declaring lack of consensus on whether the
> MTI video codec debate has a technical basis?

Sure I will upgrade that to be one of the chairs saying that some people think the decisions involves technical issues and some people do not. It is not a statement from the chair if the debate is technical or not - just a statement that people disagree on this. 

Cullen <with my co-chair hat on>