Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1A921F8B3C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0GBMeBrEDY1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B41121F8B35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkuw5 with SMTP id w5so2172082bku.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=06vVLhmtWjLvD9Q+mMV5JCPITydSj+Ff8qocLnNpzT4=; b=jjd8NHGqVgmwdP1BTFNDVc8h7KNdNtdd4yf3hzCYM5fiUrrf13CkhY750lH9qP28f0 svxl5EKYhJaJeS/SGDwIS4zbdK7+xswRU7HXKLcPXL08SVIu0MQipnqDPLVX8IwEEsMl /K8sID+JiaJT0HzpPh64UF7g+0I7c/ifIRMBERwlBoABNpTTqY6uKCL+d5+7za38Y6ct ApZNtUt2s21sU5KfS6KB2JsHoEz1WMueFbCo5tLRHQHrc3i/KopEF1BEu0J0aawb7pjl mCdN5iQD/p0hradUtN6KTDbEzRbfhDMrY4v5THv+wKK00UDN+93hKwaC0t5LvY+xcdgV kmZw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.156 with SMTP id g28mr14178670bkw.83.1333027806099; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.38.73 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <blu0-P2-EAS10401F750CA9A684CE265C93480@phx.gbl>
References: <CABkgnnWwaAgF5YQ0dP45yeYetRjBuuSt2C9epHtcTcUqeRkd+g@mail.gmail.com> <blu0-P2-EAS10401F750CA9A684CE265C93480@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:30:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVC3122KOgbhsj5Ag=UwtscxDBAb-MOfHdCjh+K6FOrkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] IdP and universal trust
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:08 -0000

On 29 March 2012 14:46, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:
> For example, +14255551212@example.com is equivalent to +14255551212@eviltwin.example.net

Actually, if third party assertions were prohibited, these would be
considered different, though I suspect that a user would have some
difficulty making the distinction.

But I take your point.