Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Thu, 11 July 2013 17:35 UTC
Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D134621F9684 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U62aXZvuq8bx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f48.google.com (mail-vb0-f48.google.com [209.85.212.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4821F9F9C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w15so788465vbf.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=/zTR42o6zeAkN4ZKfzkjrHqsY0Jr26BwLiAmffaWeKo=; b=RG5PS48V8L7zXVI2qx+x5Qz4UD0sHyPZCXGa3fr+yWdfs9NoZMccCS4rvppunRSnjJ VLGPqd9hOBPZWajc6IWzKqwfpxO/AVX9tlAoF5f5NFmNcTzxcdnyNE+zLCqRWFkyXLDW yu3H0Fk28LcUSl2FyunhTgUVrd4R/Pf80MFgw9k6EV8vpyJEaoCGGy/HR1TRJlwv1THH nrbRN8nM+INMWMuIs9lZknfbxeBH3kOlZ9CxVYTJmVsmBCl/oYAq58Fl7JCsOEQXa3T4 K39ic5miaUmEtLUIs02YRkMHVM/MK15TZZlo9gVDq8lbpggHOCAnADcpREz6+RoJAlaR S1DA==
X-Received: by 10.52.16.105 with SMTP id f9mr18603895vdd.28.1373564135140; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x236.google.com (mail-ve0-x236.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id aw3sm22505720vdc.2.2013.07.11.10.35.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ox1so7519215veb.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.165.239 with SMTP id zb15mr18758627vdb.44.1373564134344; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.45.71 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.45.71 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:35:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPvvaa+dyYmvsareEy1a9+7ketEFjNarsnRLXkpT_YHPTYni2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c24eb04e178204e13fd2cc"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcDIkN94u7OniikMvsZ56LOfd9h1qN7Om2jweUyiUTZ0oruDnsdo72dwhVAf5+K6dSkwMh
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:35:55 -0000
Hey Ted, I am sorry I must have missed your call for presentations. In you last mail on the subject you mentioned that we will be discussing No Plan in Berlin together with plans A and B. Could we please add this to the agenda? Emil --sent from my mobile On Jul 11, 2013 6:51 PM, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > Below is an initial draft agenda for the upcoming meeting. Since we have > not yet reached the draft deadline (which is the 15th), there may be new > drafts or updates that result in changes. We did already receive requests > for NAT/Firewall traversal discussion, and the chairs will be working with > the document authors to get them considered in the appropriate groups. > > As folks have probably noticed, we are meeting Thursday and Friday, after > the MMUSIC sessions are complete (they are Tuesday and Wednesday). This > should allow us to discuss the results on our first day. > > Please send feedback or change proposals to the list. > > thanks, > > Ted and Cullen > > Day 1: > > Should SDES be part of WebRTC security practice and, if so, how? > Presentations: 30 minutes > Discussion: 40 minutes > > Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents > Presentation: 30 minutes > Discussion: 30 minutes > > Security document updates > Presentation: 10 minutes > Discussion: 10 minutes > > Day 2: > > Chair Discussion: 10 minutes > > Use Case Requirements updates: > Issues list presentation: 20 minutes > Discussion: 20 minutes > > Data channel: > Issues list presentation: 45 minutes > Discussion: 45 minutes > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > >
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Hadriel Kaplan
- [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hrishikesh Kulkarni
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Cullen Jennings