Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <> Thu, 07 November 2013 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B550711E80DC for <>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.473
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkZFpSrOl4CB for <>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15B111E81AD for <>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:40:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2367; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383842424; x=1385052024; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=PizDwRuneBcHVv7N0i98AMa8hmz4LvGuFYss0uMisvc=; b=fa5EiaR16VPyTOkew4G2fRM2ennXCsS4e4OURMNXeuQJEK9v9lA91OzY DxOESSm5o84ap0oBL4BCyfTCXlMwTfZt/zGgNyjXOAJWUcBwyzG0D2PFP IvLxZP9Q9a2OYIqYEiCWkJ7+tLICS4Xv/0mXhptIMkE139EuDQ/Y4V0sf 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,652,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="282088978"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2013 16:40:16 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA7GeG5W031654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:40:16 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:40:16 -0600
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <>
To: Gregory Maxwell <>, David Singer <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
Thread-Index: AQHO29gJj5emc/4RUEOTx5kqzaPd1g==
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:40:15 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:40:30 -0000

The previous comparisons used poor x264 settings and different rate
The latest comparisons used better x264 settings:
...and then more similar rate controls:

In the end, it is a draw, with or without rate control. Which was expected
since the actual coding tools are virtually identical. We could have saved
a lot of time and posturing if the codec experts on both sides would have
just admitted this. Performance is a wash (when ignoring high profile).


On 11/7/13, 4:47 AM, Gregory Maxwell <> wrote:

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:35 PM, David Singer <> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 15:19 , Harald Alvestrand <> wrote:
>> Re performance, and just so that silence isn't taken as me agreeing
>>with David Singer on this topic:
>> I haven't wanted to distract from the debate at hand by tossing more
>>numbers around, but we do think VP8 is significantly better than
>>Baseline. The exchanges with Ericsson have shown that we need to be
>>meticulously clear in defining what we mean by that and how we measure
>>it, so I won't post more numbers until I feel that our description is
>>precise enough.
> I also would like to see some tests which tell us where we really are.
>A lot of us are engineers who like having facts, even if, as many of us
>realize, the comparative performance is a minor part of the debate.
> I welcome Ericsson's efforts to get clarity in this area; they seem to
>have been working very hard to get a level playing field measure, and if
>you can help that effort, this would be all to the good.

Hm.  Maybe I'm confused: I thought slide 9 from the H.264 "joint
presentation" in Atlanta ( )
showed baseline needing 16% more bitrate than VP8 at the same quality,
and the debate was more over high profile and the magnitude of VP8's
lead wrt baseline.

(And, also in agreement: quality isn't the thing to debate in
excruciating detail, but I did think at least this point wasn't
controversial. Did I miss a post?)
rtcweb mailing list