[rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 00:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AD721E804D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5nSW+RlelD2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-f54.google.com (mail-qe0-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E656F21E8049 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 1so3958762qeb.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=rSFQ/bSa4/gRn1w3r6D48J14VCt39OQM/AmHB9OJ43M=; b=gLautWP6r7UH7rokTneqiY0wwemC47GQMaVRvypIcoGtDj7d9eFUTTl1PEYlISUvFx AG/fwS2Mrtx4/rdDe+uQOE3GhYhx8tSI9M7+9ouOYqIfJwpvChuZAExTNHaX+NbN/L61 eXVShnKmdZVsNs9CDWpdXwq0HarlC2u3HpdHnkwASnF8SMNz4KiqyPl0YELJLBipbHQX srbkTkZpvaA0iUq6hp1R+RtgMspLerWXlQbCp0aZIlGADPl3Gx7tEmuhiDMYFucjAmFY pLCnD2rG21MjuiDtWwa9ZHzOTtfIwdbfO6VeI+FzF61FtqYsTqfZ3g7vVvYQGuK3m9rI 9lqg==
X-Received: by 10.49.127.101 with SMTP id nf5mr11401141qeb.20.1361406464174; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.28.230 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.173]
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMg0AdhFj61S1hgz9WCP2JikLabrm3dAA36hyb99_93Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6dc0bcb147b304d6312431"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlOMdQHS1mJm97KMISBBViWj6aIxpulhdjOeQIhV8RqWbgmhV9Rv1Q04rdwVki9FrQjayAt
Subject: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:27:45 -0000
In the tradition of the Interim, I tried to sit down and work out an agenda that reflects that I think the important concerns are, namely: - Video codecs (as promised) - Multiplexing of media flows - Trickle ICE - DataChannels Two notes about cross-WG interaction: - I'm assuming that most of the MMUSIC time will be used for RTCWEB-type stuff, though I left 30 min for other MMUSIC business on Tue. - I don't know how much time AVTEXT needs given the AVTEXT/ MMUSIC merger on Fri. We can reduce the draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan time accordingly based on agenda requests. Hope this is useful. I'm of course happy to get on a call to discuss this if that helps. -Ekr RTCWEB I: Tuesday 0900-1130 0900 - 0905 Administrivia 0905 - 1100 Video Codec MTI discussion - draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00 (30 mins) - draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-00+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-00+draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00 (30 mins) - General discussion 30 min) - Call the question of which mandatory to implement video codec to select (5 min) - Next steps (20 min) 1100 - 1115 draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements (LC comments) 1115 - 1130 draft-ietf-draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview (LC comments) MMUSIC I: Tuesday 1520-1830 1520 - 1525 Administrivia 1525 - 1605 Trickle ICE (Ivov) - Under what conditions can you do full trickle (discovery) - When can checking stop? [UPDATE vs. in-band vs...?] - SDP/SIP encoding for additional trickle candidates 1605 - 1650 - Bundle - draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives (15 min) - draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation (15 min) - discussion/consensus calls (15 min) 1650 - 1700 [Break] 1700 - 1800 SDP attribute analysis for multiplexing - draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes 1800 - 1830 [Other MMUSIC business] RTCWEB II: Thursday 0900-1130 0900 - 0905 Administrivia 0905 - 1025 Data Channel negotiation - draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol (15 min) - draft-thomson-rtcweb-data (15 min) - draft-marcon-rtcweb-data-channel-management (15 min) - Discussion (30 min) - Consensus call (5 min) 1025 - 1100 JSEP Update (Uberti) - draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep 1100 - 1115 RTCP-XR (Westerlund) 1115 - 1130 RTP Concepts and relation - daft-burman-rtcweb-mmusic-media-structure MMUSIC II: Friday 0900-1100 0900 - 0905 Administrivia 0905 - 0925 Requirements (draft-jennings-mmusic-media-req) 0925 - 1015 PC-track to m-line mapping (draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan) 1015 - 1100 MSID changes to match multiplexing (draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan)
- [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ron