Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <> Wed, 17 July 2013 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D4B21F9E36 for <>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.881
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.282, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3R2Xf1fa4wa for <>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76A321F9A05 for <>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server id; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:31:02 +0000
Received: from mail60-db8 (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F821300419; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:31:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI;;; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 0
X-BigFish: VS0(zzzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail60-db8: domain of designates as permitted sender) client-ip=;; ; ;
Received: from mail60-db8 (localhost.localdomain []) by mail60-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 1374096584689247_27675; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:29:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBD3B80053; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:29:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:29:42 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0136.001; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:29:04 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <>
To: Ted Hardie <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
Thread-Index: AQHOfLmwMutMwraSzEud0Hjh6FFtPplpbmzw
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:29:03 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:31:20 -0000

Ted Hardie:

	The recent set of API discussions has been spread across both the rtcweb and public-webrtc mailing lists.  That's making it both harder to follow and harder for folks to work
	out who is saying what under which rules.  The chairs of both groups believe that the right place for the discussion to continue should be public-webrtc.  Please direct follow-
	ups on this topic to that list.

Does that include moving the SDP "API surface" discussions and decisions to the public-webrtc mailing lists? 

I am frankly quite concerned given earlier comments that yes, the W3C had given responsibility for "JSEP" and the resulting SDP work to IETF, and so now we have the IETF WG making decisions but the discussion happening on the W3C list -- which means there's no "paper trail" prior to the IETF meeting on an IETF list about how the participants have weighed in -- and then conversely when the W3C spec gets to last call there will be no "paper trail" at the W3C showing how decisions had been reached about the SDP "API", as that happened over in the MMUSIC WG, which list was not even copied on this message.

Matthew Kaufman