Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D8421F8557 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFCSlFWnIj1t for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE521F854F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:35:43 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.230]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:35:43 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
Thread-Index: AQHMgxg9t26sU6mqcUiutAVu1kLdKQ==
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:35:42 +0000
Message-ID: <6F3520FE-BAB2-44C6-8286-33474F01D545@acmepacket.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [216.41.24.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <3A7F57BD2E8FD043A6EF15DF8F8FFE93@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:32:39 -0000

The draft already exists, available here:
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm

There are also lots of free tutorials about writing it, available here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript

There are even lots of books about it, available here:
http://www.amazon.com/s/field-keywords=javascript

-hadriel


On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to make progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list discussion needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make progress, and so we're putting forward the following:
> 
> 1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in this space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent by October 7th *THIS FRIDAY*.
> 
> 2) Please have a -00 draft out for discussion by October 14th (the following Friday).  This is to allow for a discussion and update prior to the -01 deadlines.
> 
> 3) We will hold a conference call to discuss the drafts on October 21st (the Friday after that).
> 
> Updates based on that discussion then have until the -01 drafts deadline to be complete.
> 
> This is aggressive, but we feel we need to have at least -00s for the different ideas in place in order to make real progress.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ted, Magnus, Cullen
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb