IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DE321F87FC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.315, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0yHm++VB0Geo for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E5B21F8797 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so79280ywa.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3jcLQOFPid/9v9OzeN7n3l42AuyPhmN2t4FczV9iOkk=; b=CDNQAis2NeacqbriTWjiAyWIq2MW8LEDyqfNnwDEcQFxzWUF2alewyY+LMNIelo4Pw V7ddbvudmEXgpSfC7v3T9I1oTvQC9WoXcuMnt+GW+Z3OvbFxl5B2TLct8VJnHb3k4eJJ Zyp0B3Jaw9cDKiU1vw4fi0T29P4MvHC58pS+I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.178.34 with SMTP id e22mr94357yhm.125.1318899404695; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.105.169 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnGfpWooceicAbLQ35oVDUZC6+d=903qSKkxW952i-8pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <15B0E3AD-3086-499A-8E79-7AE58B3376C4@cisco.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159957@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfnGfpWooceicAbLQ35oVDUZC6+d=903qSKkxW952i-8pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:56:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMC-SUWL=igif2ze8YUG_uyisr3zNmbPVAZE4aQWrvwdLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303f69b482e91304af8832fb"
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>, rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:56:45 -0000

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2011/10/18 Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>:
> > I like your proposed idea as it is going in the direction of having
> > "standard" signaling protocol for RTCWeb.
>
> Please Ravindran, don't manipulate mails, text and draft given by
> other persons in this WG. The draft *clearly* says:
>
>
Iñaki,


Ravindran's email clearly says "is going in the direction of", not "is a
standard signalling protocol".

In general, critiquing others' statement of support on vocabulary choices is
not really helpful.  Focus on your contributions, please, rather than
assuming that others are "manipulations".  This is not useful nor collegial
behavior.

regards,

Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email