Re: [rtcweb] Additional requirement - audio-only communication

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Sat, 27 August 2011 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BF321F8ABD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DkS9Ac5j+2I for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stewe.org (stewe.org [85.214.122.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF0421F8ACA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unverified [24.5.184.151]) by stewe.org (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 29712-1743317 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:19:17 +0200
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:19:09 -0400
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CA7E6671.3035D%stewe@stewe.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Additional requirement - audio-only communication
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W2519098D92E87F138A4B1293120@phx.gbl>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3397281557_15091516"
X-Originating-IP: 24.5.184.151
X-Authenticated-User: stewe@stewe.org
X-ORBS-Stamp: Your IP (24.5.184.151) was found in the spamhaus database. http://www.spamhaus.net
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Additional requirement - audio-only communication
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:18:01 -0000

Or perhaps pointers on this list to the newest version every now and then
(whenever a major update has happened)?
Specifically, is Harald's draft from March 24 still the one to look at?
(The companion lists have quite a bit of traffic, and there are only so many
cycles per day to monitor those, especially if API design is not in your
core interest or competency).
Thanks,
Stephan


From:  Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Date:  Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:55:06 -0700
To:  <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>om>, <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [rtcweb] Additional requirement - audio-only communication

[BA] Agreed that there seems to be some misconceptions about what the
current API proposal can do.

To clear this up, would it make sense to have a (brief) presentation on the
API at the interim?

       
_______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb