IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB RFCs Published (aka draining cluster 238)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 01 February 2021 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059A63A12E5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:01:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q8_b2KqkYmm7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDC63A12E6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id 186so9460051vsz.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:01:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qMJ9ximYQEcamrw5glwS3latWwq0Hxva+sLQeprups4=; b=J376LyHJH6+CTCzSrGwPxD8Uhy6yXJkHlOmvMRUvbxhEeRAw08JKhS0BmQHNmtdADr ohHI6VN5sOiQLhsW7fzpGHGvXbQ1zQiMJUc0jIrkBhJfdK/RHEO7zIgOjWlGK+7ViwAU vA9sQzdU+FAyQg5WuvX5/zKT/gjbn6efPLooZqd3coLIE3jnUfggyPrLS/LEhn+nw4i7 zASG82nMrCa7dcuWrtKUpZUp8gzTHKAnGwtWs3fopWUUr34LhtihxWKqFLbWFQcmNPjo AcP4vTIfDpIy1THkMiMxbISdWEqWh09kO8ig0UlwzuiApEYvfK2741rmIsGFjVjjV1sa 2Afg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qMJ9ximYQEcamrw5glwS3latWwq0Hxva+sLQeprups4=; b=ttDRGsw2KgOY+TUw9y/hKniezhTJG1Wzmue2IUi/Bd4thoWPvO8kPKbj9WKjqZDeCk 834Zy+Vl+eOK6GIq8JmtKP4BIZK1nP4pJUXgqSP3YMeeio+Lpa99TFCg2YLVTalwIp4N YbYkSWBrdz9luHIe34HbkdzV+xAdnmuBxJFKucRAPGiPQ3zGrG6sitc8s7jw2+3PpicJ 0MH63KQ7JvePl1GxMEBPjYzSbQnZg8FSEMeGwnagTsOauzuErLFkUsU1fuPCg8UFGPT9 RKAaj2i9JTS/79/GzxdfnRxQUGfGkRTEeY5BYci9EBlvo3rsqmUj+yDkpGXMBqtGHOCk lAqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LqZSTJOXwIri9YS1rVwJPnBOcySIDsWpYRXNQih3JyqjRSzn3 x/KxyFzTskUsGpdcmwk2+3MWMoIMhYGGZqCZYURhUNN2Xz8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvHhO4hgg5tm8cunUffo1DPvP3xkyAZzukFnGCOjRL6+mZyWa1ukoFia2psjgiGU2CwpB7NBa/sVUe+Oih2cI=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ff15:: with SMTP id v21mr5027665vsp.0.1612198878183; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9331E58E-23EB-40B9-A70E-3586E0B4B467@sn3rd.com> <CAOW+2duyhSp5bBzZScSsiVv5o1oh_vStjFKff-zKjWcuGNT6Pw@mail.gmail.com> <DDDBC74C-21DA-435D-B922-4376FEE2CC2F@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDDBC74C-21DA-435D-B922-4376FEE2CC2F@sn3rd.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:01:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYxRzbDtiCzmR9nLpWS=qHF_wt2n_XA2i0acu+AEoZtMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000071075a05ba494d53"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ptFlIsaN3TNcuweb_lAtbbmvzKA>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB RFCs Published (aka draining cluster 238)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:01:21 -0000

It was pointed out to me that the examples document follows the BUNDLE part
of the conflict contained in C238.  Is it possible that this needs to be
reconsidered, and this document possibly updated, as that conflict gets
resolved?

-MSK

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> The SDP examples I-D document action popped out today!
>
> spt
>
> > On Jan 21, 2021, at 11:05, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Many thanks on the heroic efforts to unblock cluster 238.  This will
> also unblock publication of the WebRTC PeerConnection API as a W3C
> Recommendation.
> >
> > Blocked Drain 238 - YouTube
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> > As you may have noticed over the last couple of days, all of RTCWEB’s
> I-D have now be published as RFCs. Congratulations to all those who
> participated.
> >
> > The SDP examples draft, which was a WG draft but ended up being
> AD-sponsored after the WG closed down, is still making its way through the
> process.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > spt
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email