IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)

Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com> Sat, 21 December 2013 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BFA1ADFD5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7C_orZRvYgwg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-x236.google.com (mail-vb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F027C1ADFCF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id g10so2161992vbg.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uwH0MNOvURwbkzhOmatPXLmNeGjoRjThuLP3EaozQ7s=; b=IgkLI81o0xXK6aKq38f+dAkwoqCe7e15dLmfIRBtF7Ua4NSX9Z9nIf5tA+Z2fv/XiU ivNOuVDmgTCFMyXxtocsZD3XOZskldU/vIY8BNAqYQrDrPJVA1nOowFJRlAHf8X2cmB0 lak0wfhrEZkXwVQazmGS6GgAlDJF37kap7qk6rDuU2KpP2aWqgtPw6N5exyGTQhVGywl 2HGMPt3MX2wHLpyskmv0RakXVIwhoZjcaO2xDQU8YeHiNEbkwRnyeOFCcHGIkAUOZ0HP atllqQc9BHJxMDgPf/pT76aAiFS4QMZN7k0b3DBqveS7sq3biT3/E5r/AIiF+okFGxN5 KPdw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.7.132 with SMTP id oo4mr1147vcb.31.1387648684177; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.224.14 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CEDB11FC.3E281%stewe@stewe.org>
References: <CAP7VpsVy0sfZpGQ2Vj=NGnvNpSjRhFc+bSaDyCaLbTLkGUjRVA@mail.gmail.com> <CEDB11FC.3E281%stewe@stewe.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:58:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CACrD=+8dMmjYWwQxw=8f97KA7sYOUCd1QrEtQMvdFqDPk7Ts6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com>
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:58:08 -0000

>>Opus had several of these.
>
> Nonsense.  Really, people, try to do a minimum of homework before
> commenting.

Opus had a number of IPR declarations against it determined by
consensus to be completely spurious.  I read nothing incorrect in
Jack's comment.

Too much of this discussion has become willfully obtuse.

Monty

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email