Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [was RE: Use Case draft]

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 02 May 2012 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AA921F85DD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4ZvGiwhQWFO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 10:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7688A21F85D9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 10:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so801676vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 May 2012 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=G4IpIoHzBhrmAzVNrhHBsqXFvWeNwkWnQf5S8YPvTL8=; b=S14Hep29bl53w17H6GVY8AV/9L0J9mlXMCy2n0nbT8wOaPEOwm9QJt8srNcvsuvuC8 SLkJa8cU4kt6x1O5zpzNHZrSt/wyq8PaUA72cHVRbOW6brjPQ8bpiJQIuGzQbV/8uahe 4bB4Z2Nnhaeob+djSCCi0ooqBZ3uwG3RrKTiV0zzILGZG/qk5q6yqTdHRcidxL5t0j9T +Rw9eUJqv6q/sbNqM5RxXQun0pT3QFGcHB+DXFpB/Rbmls83ZgQ3HqXV+sFPHTfUf8gi jUhhLdvsOrrrfPVl40MWabtGuXfoYepEhbmsiz7/kwc970cqFah35RV7zPTRY1zAlDNA hwDA==
Received: by 10.52.77.70 with SMTP id q6mr16600183vdw.61.1335981263735; Wed, 02 May 2012 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.107.199 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 10:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <013101cd288c$09328250$1b9786f0$@com>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <BLU169-W7C59E1EDB4CB06B648577932B0@phx.gbl> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23AFFF@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <2E496AC9-63A0-464A-A628-7407ED8DD9C4@phonefromhere.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23B16B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <E2714FBC-D06B-4A12-9E07-C49EBF55084C@phonefromhere.com> <4F9EC0B2.10903@alcatel-lucent.com> <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31299282765@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <CAJNg7VKENERKAFA-n5KeoeBNmGgHrnzDOU0BzC9+fSdsuGwdEw@mail.gmail.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F24F@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <4FA0F43E.4020308@ericsson.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F336@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <013101cd288c$09328250$1b9786f0$@com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:54:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=RsHHf9jCBhE55t7qFUpts8yJ1c8qUX12nc_vd4vgjSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfaWVJDjfjfPMFtc7X51fM7+5VSXrONZVCScQayPCuj7YxFiFPlInFdrkVUIwnlXNIvvw5
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [was RE: Use Case draft]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 17:54:25 -0000

2012/5/2 Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>:
> For other decisions, such as if we disallow un-encrypted RTP by
> WEBRTC endpoints, we create a requirement that some device does
> the interworking between WEBRTC endpoints (which do only SRTP)
> and non-WEBRTC endpoints (which do RTP).  That means, for that
> interworking, we would adopt the interworking model on slide 7
> that I presented at IETF83,
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-WEBRTC-3.pdf

Hi, the link is broken (404). Could you please point to a working one?

Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>