IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176451A90A5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bn3zTLRMfrHr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D49F11A909D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t4RJMFeu027342 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 May 2015 19:22:15 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id t4RJMBmP017009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2015 21:22:14 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.42) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:22:11 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.28]) by DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:22:10 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
To: "ext Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment
Thread-Index: AQHQgx/q7KWF0Xdw9kyt1tqhlfwnMp2QXTqg
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:22:10 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF81968336D@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <D8920B96-7C22-4F9F-B323-FC59120C7508@ieca.com>, <5531EFD2.5010107@alvestrand.no> <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF81962D96C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AAEC0E1EC8@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <5537CA1F.1060209@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E75341E@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <55412808.7040409@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E7547BD@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E7547BD@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.115]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1203
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1432754535-00006C8C-D29D9B47/0/0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/q406IwyuYL4Nf0jp1yMaRlWjnEg>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:22:26 -0000

Hi Andy,

Fair comment - this will be addressed in the version I upload as adopted.

Kind regards,
Uwe

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Hutton, Andrew [mailto:andrew.hutton@unify.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:30 AM
To: Harald Alvestrand; Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich); rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment

Section 2 contains the following text:

"Since a gateway is expected to be deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address (as seen from the client), a WebRTC gateway does not need to support full ICE; it therefore MAY implement ICE-Lite only".

It might be a minor comment but I think it is wrong to say that a gateway "is expected to be deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address" and this gives the wrong impression.

A gateway might be deployed in such a way but I would not say it is expected to be deployed that way.

So I suggest the following text.

"A WebRTC gateway which is deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address (as seen from the client), does not need to support full ICE; it therefore MAY implement ICE-Lite only".

Regards
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email