IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Tue, 09 July 2013 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01D821F8FE5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.695, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuxmMZr5IgGG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5F321F9F5E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j1so8357965oag.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=Z7kZbV6OsPogIbpqX/eTL5FMRoWN3QkzxD8agmvFAPQ=; b=BkxxyTUg55dqYOIc6pt0wI0eR4oIvcA/Wf2F01xSU1oFpgWoLEiHt268N2fbB6rXuX 23lsfi/6tQ9NM9/l4/fFSi8z2aCWYz/xYOjUfChe90aaJjE2ifos0lsoWf76hejIWYlF MTHOyoWLxhmd3LxE2eGFFROev2syHK+cS7KnuKjVEQriVfARo8pUqMh2F4+1Hpypkgfz 4pENq6qWMlqIITANw3uw/kmhKuIRwNGXYBbR9/kaRVIL9CT8oN5HgNY6+RgjH3dZXr8v jNwKmdRc/KgK+o5hRJ2jamIcuzdwhnLl6O21S4cLzBPuS/HAMv/1pPoEXHFbcfFJdYyL pbiQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.56.229 with SMTP id d5mr24896772oeq.7.1373391001882; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm39124213oby.5.2013.07.09.10.29.59 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51DC485B.8060507@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:28:59 -0400
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMAaaT5RRLUrGvzs0zB0jXRQdHLm5HJH5-VkT5p1ZetVPQ@mail.gmail.com> <51DC3644.4020107@bbs.darktech.org> <rjhot81beom5klmus2q346aoothq1ob7nv@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <rjhot81beom5klmus2q346aoothq1ob7nv@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfBYZiZZ+CNGvXh1cBSDAxuVfN84YR0eNesYqJS6AiGqo6ipXJ8LzqSDT7SBTVHT//yaOS
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:34:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:30:08 -0000

On 09/07/2013 1:26 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * cowwoc wrote:
>>      I agree, with one caveat: virtually none of the high-level
>> stakeholders (spec editors, browser vendors, etc) bother to engage the
>> community on public-webrtc.
> W3C's Web Real-Time Communications Working Group is required to address
> all feedback it receives in a timely and technically sound manner. Take
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013AprJun/0081
> up Anne van Kesteren's offer to help if that is not working out for you.

     Glad to hear it. Thanks!

     I look forward to hearing their feedback.

Gili

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email