Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integrity (Re: Use Case draft - legacy interop)
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 07 May 2012 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9521F86F9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 14:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aI5TJJ4Uy5XK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 14:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268B221F86F8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 14:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; l=1083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1336425821; x=1337635421; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XQl8sBOKL2Cw8YxUIKxrnMFi3f4VgjLTFdOQb/X6j9M=; b=BfTivomUVzvLrULmEFftV/gmJ1kVhLlBJYz0odJKo0xfikfUTTx2wd6B N57pg5z6cSLWOktMGLeSZUBmcSoLjx48FWps+FD4YBiITeaPwEqce5cOH nPFH6rI87nR34bE2YOFitv/e3SXHS/6zWPhb562DdJrqUs2pkuV9TQQO+ 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFAFc8qE+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEhXKccJA9gQeCDAEBAQMBCAoBEAdPBQcBAwIJDwIEAQEBAgIjAwICGSMKCQgBAQQTCxeHZwSbCY0WknqBL4lQhHGBGASIZIUWll2BaYMJ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,546,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="43859301"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2012 21:23:40 +0000
Received: from dwingWS ([10.32.240.195]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q47LNe2I016137; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:23:40 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Harald Alvestrand' <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com> <2E496AC9-63A0-464A-A628-7407ED8DD9C4@phonefromhere.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23B16B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <E2714FBC-D06B-4A12-9E07-C49EBF55084C@phonefromhere.com> <4F9EC0B2.10903@alcatel-lucent.com> <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31299282765@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <CAJNg7VKENERKAFA-n5KeoeBNmGgHrnzDOU0BzC9+fSdsuGwdEw@mail.gmail.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F24F@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <4FA0F43E.4020308@ericsson.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F336@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <4FA1575C.4050508@ericsson.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F4BF@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <4FA37A1E.4080806@alvestrand.no> <CALiegf=H5QH_YY-cJ4z29wChWZ-VoQpHvsZCeaJPjTgVp+km3Q@mai l.gmail.com> <0db701cd 2adb$98082f10$c8188d30$@com> <CALiegf=C7a6zeUDHn-Wuku9eFWmADG5N+D8oXSQbwJKSYYjcQg@mail.gmail.com> <0dc901cd2ae3$f9ffb500$edff1f00$@com> <4FA83B3A.9070600@alvestr and.no>
In-Reply-To: <4FA83B3A.9070600@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:23:48 -0700
Message-ID: <027601cd2c97$b107e1a0$1317a4e0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac0slml7ggANXaVuRwiZD1QI8yaR9AAASAlg
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integrity (Re: Use Case draft - legacy interop)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:23:42 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:15 PM > To: Dan Wing > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Consent freshness and message-integrity (Re: [rtcweb] Use Case > draft - legacy interop) > > Forking the thread, since this is a different detail..... > > On 05/05/2012 07:24 PM, Dan Wing wrote: > > The other nuance is that, because > > doing the SHA1 for MESSAGE-INTEGRITY isn't needed for consent > freshness, > > there is desire to allow those periodic ICE connectivity checks to > > omit the MESSAGE-INTEGRITY, which is a change to ICE. See > > draft-muthu-behave-consent-freshness. > Omitting MESSAGE-INTEGRITY would allow off-path attackers to inject > fake > connectivity checks, and thus to simulate continued consent. To successfully do that, those off-path attackers would have to guess the random 96-bit STUN transaction-id. -d > If connectivity checks for content freshness are worth doing, they're > worth protecting. > My $0.02. > > Harald
- [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Cavigioli, Chris
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integrity … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Harald Alvestrand