Re: [rtcweb] draft-alvestrand-one-rtp-00.txt and profile

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sun, 14 August 2011 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4647D21F86DD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8nR1p37tma8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA3121F86D0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCFF39E0FA; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:14:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EcjcQsvt+rfm; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.19.59.203] (c-5eeaaa22-74736162.cust.telenor.se [94.234.170.34]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F79A39E0D4; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852203D41B70@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852203D41B70@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----6IMK0FPP6JL64QULE61KWQAKUC5GDB"
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:15:29 +0200
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <4e4d793b-8748-41c8-a9ea-ded2237cda03@email.android.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-alvestrand-one-rtp-00.txt and profile
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:15:08 -0000

The profile affects the protocols available (such as tmmbr, or whether it is rtp or something completely different. Some parameters may be meaningless under a different profile. So making profile dependent on TOGETHER support looked strange to me. Do you see any case where different profiles would be critical?
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

Hi Harald,

Section 3 of the draft says that the profile of the sections MUST be the same, but there is no justification.

Could you please explain the reason behind that MUST?

Regards,

Christer