Re: [rtcweb] The MTI Codec Questions (what to ask and how to ask them)

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782E1A88D4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:36:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8U6iLePqf3o for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF5B1A88D0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e131so9943902oig.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:36:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=eDDHpxbpftKBUw+sKLXhmqSpT7U6H435/i5Xmi2/SUQ=; b=YOSUXa/IrBl0WIncemeujTJMjhAaOS0tEd4h28UDnLY2u0GZdXRHldeTlaVc5v+h6H 2uif6LgXV94XQkuekJp1THCz8x/xXdVVhRuIZuKThdRxy5Zrnl9F/WTGQOYG0gfYHYE1 dKt5s1sK7k/HKANPlUGkBH24dSnjgPAQhPLVGb5xeXkabqDAAdJZ8r6OXZlrHmz1IaoB YkV34anxerbU9zbA6OtNo8+e3Ih3abqsY09lETQE5sy1OVRbvLNc+GffTwu54eBhhspd rsDllHPeIszMmOGE0RVNnF0oC7rs4qAF1X50waBGoVwl2c3NKWr0kSZyCy5JaQRJtFJE I2yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=eDDHpxbpftKBUw+sKLXhmqSpT7U6H435/i5Xmi2/SUQ=; b=M9PXdgygMyQ0wnQbCIxqDpzRBPUU33uTipLGvDMwvv76KKnbXkGM7oJaV5KTiSquXk /aDhW1H/DiInmHzPZJJgN0nlHIqbf66MCPvGHrwrPQjp/pj47NgM8wAdqv0H6I3dpAFi mWFeEMaGFJAZIZeJK0L6SgySrNHSaH81LWX3VmZEOyjw+9BTKjjHQyGHeuE5/uCOUPGJ xAn79SQBxirjNvYLTcIg0h6d0MJZwPUHKpTPhGqCYi1mznA07b3NDp55NrMRApykaHOG GVidouTOMgJwmbM9d+0EWkoqN3GC5l60JsVwbbRMjPdnWt0gbYyl6uZ5PjQcRmgF8okw A5Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQauUSHO7tAUIwzp6uwVHMqTPEBPVxy0QFu7Hdqt2f5G4Lz/fYNumaPJeyOjJTqnzACsun
X-Received: by 10.182.24.166 with SMTP id v6mr40899186obf.30.1415083002375; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:36:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.248.170 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:36:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54581E56.10407@matthew.at>
References: <98200BCB-ABC9-4BE0-B11D-B7AEC9F8B2A4@ieca.com> <54581E56.10407@matthew.at>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:36:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3jrLXGqiTSk5Us8jHniGCCUQFfnb4v5SKUn=Li-Oz3AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2eca4af7dc7050702af07"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/qP5x4ThT73ZUnbF6co4EFnHbS7g
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] The MTI Codec Questions (what to ask and how to ask them)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:36:45 -0000

>
>
>
> ps. Doing this with hums at a meeting just encourages filling the room
> with people who aren't participating in the process but whose employers
> have asked them to stuff the room to increase the hum volume. Those people
> will all stand up for question #1, then leave immediately after the hums
> are completed. Just like last time.


I am shocked -- shocked -- at these allegations of room stuffing in our
beloved IETF.  Surely the blue
<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/bluesheets/bluesheets-88-rtcweb-01.pdf>
sheets
<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/bluesheets/bluesheets-88-rtcweb-02.pdf>
from IETF 88 (the last time we discussed codecs, on day 2) will put to rest
these claims.

Wait...

CompanyDay2 RTCWEB AttendeesDay1 RTCWEB AttendeesDeltacisco251510mozilla1212
0ericsson1055huawei1082google990alu642oracle550
(stats shown for all company affiliations reported by 5 or more people)