[rtcweb] Data Channels Proposal: Now in Internet Draft Form

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 18 February 2013 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A8C21F8C3E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zka8zBkSHsrL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7922421F8C3D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so3846516wib.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8QFTPXWNUe/KeLxFi1fFNtchRCrxiW1T4p8+lP4l3rw=; b=f/JCm96DEYtKsKK5Jmv7WKN4pFeWH21ITOBB5gVdWHfIpIMPuvNBmk6gAFyh6XLtOP cnBMw1T38VPD1GcG0yDN1wZ/1SH22DpHAGVvgVryCvsp/dMhKb8VdTQ6POOl5RmOdAXY koY7OduXbnydTxl4H9GRf3teBk041Qx4JiDEvHAaPJmJgPbQI+sRRbcc2rF/dz4BG9JO 16q9twoWJWBM3shclmeVIbyuIBK+8eJQX32WfEfCqTutcy8xnfhA8Vh5lmp0/780cPh7 bgp8DdRytc6Nc45ReLLIua1nDd1Y1jFpjy+J2r3z/VKvgL8j2vFRWFo9q2iNL+bQNmSf edHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.80.35 with SMTP id o3mr22364188wix.9.1361209899993; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.5.135 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:51:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXR5Gp-C8G6AyHDMKKqE=xohkN-GKYV-=B1BhqHkxdHDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [rtcweb] Data Channels Proposal: Now in Internet Draft Form
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:51:58 -0000

I think that we're actually at the point where the involved parties
each understand each other's positions.  Now comes the time to provide
everyone else with a coherent proposal that they can evaluate.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-rtcweb-data-00

This is intended as an alternative to the mechanisms in
draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel.  It is also intended to render
draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol unnecessary.  That is, of course, as
long as it meets with the approval of the working group.